Wouter van den Bos

6.1k citations
98 papers · 3.9k indexed · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Wouter van den Bos

92 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Wouter van den Bos
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • General Decision Sciences 445
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Applied Psychology 450
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 918
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
Replace Brooks King‐Casas with:
Brooks King‐Casas United States
Rongjun Yu China
Daria Knoch Switzerland
Amitai Shenhav United States
Johannes Hewig Germany
Peter Sokol‐Hessner United States
Bernd Figner Netherlands
A. Ross Otto Canada
Jason Chein United States
Xiaolin Zhou China
Wouter van den Bos relative to Brooks King‐Casas United States Brooks King‐Casas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Brooks King‐Casas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter van den Bos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter van den Bos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter van den Bos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter van den Bos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter van den Bos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter van den Bos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter van den Bos. The network helps show where Wouter van den Bos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wouter van den Bos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wouter van den Bos Line = papers co-authored together Wouter van den Bos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20246
4 20240
5 202316
6 202331
7 20230
8 20228
9 20229
10 202120
11 202116
12 202055
13 202018
14 201996
15 201925
16 2014112
17 201296
18 201261
19 200847
20 20062

About Wouter van den Bos

Wouter van den Bos is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (26 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (15 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (445 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Applied Psychology (450 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (918 citations) and Social Psychology (1.1k citations). Wouter van den Bos has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eveline A. Crone, Samuel M. McClure, Berna Güroğlu, Serge A.R.B. Rombouts, Simon Ciranka, Julie B. Schweitzer, Michiel Westenberg, Eric van Dijk, Christian A. Rodriguez and Ralph Hertwig. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Scientific Reports, Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026