Eleanor Miles
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Thomas L. WebbPaschal SheeranRichard J. CrispPeter TotterdellGiulia PoerioCarolien MartijnJessica M. AllevaEllen Poliakoff
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (16 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Eleanor Miles
45 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
- Social Psychology 955
- Cognitive Neuroscience 666
- Applied Psychology 575
Countries citing papers authored by Eleanor Miles
This map shows the geographic impact of Eleanor Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eleanor Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eleanor Miles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eleanor Miles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eleanor Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eleanor Miles. The network helps show where Eleanor Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eleanor Miles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eleanor Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eleanor Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eleanor Miles. Eleanor Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 220 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 178 | |
| 16 | Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation.breakdown → | 1324 |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Eleanor Miles
Eleanor Miles is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 48 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (16 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (575 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations). Eleanor Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas L. Webb, Paschal Sheeran, Richard J. Crisp, Peter Totterdell, Giulia Poerio, Paschal Sheeran, Carolien Martijn, Jessica M. Alleva, Ellen Poliakoff and Peter R. Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, PLoS ONE and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.