Katherine Maillet

513 total citations
9 papers, 271 citations indexed

About

Katherine Maillet is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine Maillet has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 271 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Education, 4 papers in Computer Science Applications and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Katherine Maillet's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). Katherine Maillet is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). Katherine Maillet collaborates with scholars based in Greece, United Kingdom and France. Katherine Maillet's co-authors include Gilberte Furstenberg, Sabine Levet, Kathryn English, Antonio Cartelli, Athanassios Jimoyiannis, Thomas Connolly, Mark Stansfield, Carlos Santos, Davinia Hernández‐Leo and Ralf Klamma and has published in prestigious journals such as Language learning & technology, Journal of Information Technology Education Research and Frontiers in Education.

In The Last Decade

Katherine Maillet

8 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Katherine Maillet Greece	6	150	132	98	67	40	9	271
Margarita Vinagre Spain	8	168 1.1×	155 1.2×	109 1.1×	57 0.9×	20 0.5×	14	309
Li Jin United States	8	131 0.9×	95 0.7×	98 1.0×	61 0.9×	22 0.6×	17	284
Sabine Levet	4	167 1.1×	150 1.1×	66 0.7×	55 0.8×	13 0.3×	6	235
Boris Vázquez-Calvo Spain	8	107 0.7×	91 0.7×	85 0.9×	66 1.0×	43 1.1×	19	290
Kathryn English France	3	160 1.1×	138 1.0×	62 0.6×	50 0.7×	13 0.3×	4	228
Gilberte Furstenberg United States	6	237 1.6×	209 1.6×	89 0.9×	71 1.1×	14 0.3×	14	329
Katerina Zourou France	7	98 0.7×	86 0.7×	49 0.5×	60 0.9×	28 0.7×	30	211
Sarah Guth Italy	7	181 1.2×	187 1.4×	143 1.5×	70 1.0×	34 0.8×	15	360
Zena Moore United States	9	183 1.2×	112 0.8×	148 1.5×	67 1.0×	12 0.3×	15	321
Chantelle Warner United States	8	141 0.9×	152 1.2×	53 0.5×	39 0.6×	11 0.3×	21	256

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Maillet

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Maillet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Maillet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Maillet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Maillet

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Maillet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Maillet. The network helps show where Katherine Maillet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Maillet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Maillet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Maillet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Maillet. Katherine Maillet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Pammer‐Schindler, Viktoria, Fridolin Wild, Mikhail Fominykh, et al.. (2020). Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Technology-Enhanced Learning in Europe. Frontiers in Education. 5. 10 indexed citations

2.

Maillet, Katherine, et al.. (2012). Strengths and weaknesses of computer science degrees: The perception from European students. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 5(1). 5 indexed citations

3.

Chatti, Mohamed Amine, et al.. (2010). PLEM: a Web 2.0 driven Long Tail aggregator and filter for e‐learning. International Journal of Web Information Systems. 6(1). 5–23. 7 indexed citations

4.

Stansfield, Mark, et al.. (2009). The Identification of Key Issues in the Development of Sustainable e-Learning and Virtual Campus Initiatives. 7(2). 155–164. 20 indexed citations

5.

Stansfield, Mark, et al.. (2009). Developing a framework for best practice in sustainable virtual campuses. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations. 6(5). 440–440.

6.

Cartelli, Antonio, et al.. (2008). Towards the Development of a New Model for Best Practice and Knowledge Construction in Virtual Campuses. Informing Science and IT Education Conference. 13 indexed citations

7.

Cartelli, Antonio, et al.. (2008). Towards the Development of a New Model for Best Practice and Knowledge Construction in Virtual Campuses. Journal of Information Technology Education Research. 7. 121–134. 4 indexed citations

8.

Quemada, Juan, et al.. (2004). Educanext. 11–11. 4 indexed citations

9.

Furstenberg, Gilberte, Sabine Levet, Kathryn English, & Katherine Maillet. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura project. Language learning & technology. 5(1). 55–102. 208 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact