Malcolm J. Bond

100 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Malcolm J. Bond
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Applied Psychology 200
  • Family Practice 66
  • Clinical Psychology 590
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 42
  • General Health Professions 581
Replace David S. Brody with:
David S. Brody United States
Kristin S. Vickers United States
John S. Wiebe United States
Adriaan Visser Netherlands
Michael Belyea United States
Stephen M. Auerbach United States
Richard J. Contrada United States
J. B. McKinlay United States
Joseph T. Hepworth United States
Shirley Musich United States
Malcolm J. Bond relative to David S. Brody United States David S. Brody's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
David S. Brody · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm J. Bond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm J. Bond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm J. Bond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm J. Bond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm J. Bond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm J. Bond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm J. Bond. The network helps show where Malcolm J. Bond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm J. Bond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm J. Bond Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm J. Bond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988235
2 2001190
3 2002151
4 1983146
5 1998123
6 200694
7 201086
8 199581
9 199772
10 199164
11 200358
12 200856
13 200449
14 199647
15 201646
16 200641
17 199141
18 201240
19 200637
20 199236

About Malcolm J. Bond

Malcolm J. Bond is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Family Support in Illness (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (200 citations), Family Practice (66 citations), Clinical Psychology (590 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (42 citations) and General Health Professions (581 citations). Malcolm J. Bond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include N. T. Feather, Michael Clark, Ruth Sladek, N Broadhurst, Kathryn Williams, Paddy A. Phillips, Lynsey Brown, Suzanne Davies, Robert D. Harris and D. S. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Health & Medicine, The Medical Journal of Australia, Disability and Rehabilitation, Australasian Journal on Ageing and Psycho-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact