Kate Lifford

2.7k total citations
37 papers, 934 citations indexed

About

Kate Lifford is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Lifford has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 934 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Oncology, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kate Lifford's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers). Kate Lifford is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers). Kate Lifford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Kate Lifford's co-authors include Anita Thapar, Gordon T. Harold, Kate Brain, Frances Rice, John K. Field, Ben Carter, Stephen W. Duffy, David Baldwin, Marianne van den Bree and Katherine H. Shelton and has published in prestigious journals such as European Heart Journal, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Kate Lifford

31 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Kate Lifford
Mary Thomas United States
Jessica L. Burris United States
Sue Burney Australia
A. E. Simon United Kingdom
Jeremy Couper Australia
Anthony Robinson United States
Mary Thomas United States
Kate Lifford
Citations per year, relative to Kate Lifford Kate Lifford (= 1×) peers Mary Thomas

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Lifford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Lifford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Lifford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Lifford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Lifford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Lifford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Lifford. The network helps show where Kate Lifford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Lifford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Lifford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Lifford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Lifford. Kate Lifford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Akbari, Ashley, Adrian Edwards, Kate Lifford, et al.. (2025). Anti‐thrombotic therapy in patients with cancer at the end of life: A cohort study using population‐linked routinely collected data. British Journal of Haematology. 207(5). 2080–2090.
2.
Williams, Denitza, Kate Lifford, Fiona Wood, et al.. (2025). Recommendations for a Communication Strategy to Support Informed Decision‐Making About Self or Clinician Sampling for Cervical Screening in the UK: Qualitative Study. Health Expectations. 28(2). e70191–e70191. 1 indexed citations
3.
Morgan, Jenna, Anne Shrestha, Charlene Martin, et al.. (2025). Preferences for quality of life versus length of life in older women deciding about treatment for early breast cancer: A cross-sectional sub-analysis of the Bridging the Age Gap study. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 16(4). 102226–102226. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lifford, Kate, et al.. (2024). Identifying optimum implementation for human papillomavirus self-sampling in underserved communities: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Screening. 32(1). 2–18. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lifford, Kate, Detelina Grozeva, Rebecca Cannings‐John, et al.. (2023). Satisfaction with remote consultations in primary care during COVID-19: a population survey of UK adults. British Journal of General Practice. 74(739). e96–e103. 5 indexed citations
8.
Lifford, Kate, Adrian Edwards, Maria Burton, et al.. (2019). Efficient development and usability testing of decision support interventions for older women with breast cancer. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 13. 131–143. 5 indexed citations
9.
Collins, Karen, et al.. (2017). 4th Symposium on Primary Breast Cancer in Older Women. Future Oncology. 13(sup8). 1–23.
10.
Burton, Maria, Karen Kilner, Lynda Wyld, et al.. (2017). Information needs and decision‐making preferences of older women offered a choice between surgery and primary endocrine therapy for early breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 26(12). 2094–2100. 25 indexed citations
11.
Lifford, Kate, Ben Carter, Fiona E. McRonald, et al.. (2015). Barriers to uptake among high-risk individuals declining participation in lung cancer screening: a mixed methods analysis of the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial. BMJ Open. 5(7). e008254–e008254. 143 indexed citations
12.
Lifford, Kate, Alison Clements, Lindsay Fraser, Deborah Lancastle, & Kate Brain. (2012). Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study. Familial Cancer. 12(1). 19–26. 6 indexed citations
13.
Brain, Kate, Kate Lifford, Lindsay Fraser, et al.. (2012). Psychological outcomes of familial ovarian cancer screening: No evidence of long-term harm. Gynecologic Oncology. 127(3). 556–563. 15 indexed citations
14.
Lifford, Kate, Lindsay Fraser, Adam N. Rosenthal, et al.. (2011). Withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery: Findings from a psychological evaluation study (PsyFOCS). Gynecologic Oncology. 124(1). 158–163. 12 indexed citations
15.
Fowler, Tom, Kate Lifford, Katherine H. Shelton, et al.. (2007). Exploring the relationship between genetic and environmental influences on initiation and progression of substance use. Addiction. 102(3). 413–422. 119 indexed citations
16.
Fowler, Tom, Katherine H. Shelton, Kate Lifford, et al.. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the relationship between peer alcohol use and own alcohol use in adolescents. Addiction. 102(6). 894–903. 47 indexed citations
17.
Bree, Marianne van den, Frances Rice, Tom Fowler, et al.. (2007). The Cardiff Study of All Wales and North West of England Twins (CaStANET): A Longitudinal Research Program of Child and Adolescent Development. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 10(1). 13–23. 16 indexed citations
18.
Rice, Frances, Kate Lifford, Hollie V. Thomas, & Anita Thapar. (2007). Mental Health and Functional Outcomes of Maternal and Adolescent Reports of Adolescent Depressive Symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 46(9). 1162–1170. 41 indexed citations
19.
Lifford, Kate, Gordon T. Harold, & Anita Thapar. (2007). Parent–Child Relationships and ADHD Symptoms: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 36(2). 285–296. 150 indexed citations
20.
Shelton, Katherine H., Kate Lifford, Tom Fowler, et al.. (2006). The Association between Conduct Problems and the Initiation and Progression of Marijuana Use during Adolescence: A Genetic Analysis across Time. Behavior Genetics. 37(2). 314–325. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026