Mark Pearson

2.9k total citations
94 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Mark Pearson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Pearson has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in General Health Professions, 27 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Pearson's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (20 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (13 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers). Mark Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (20 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (13 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers). Mark Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Mark Pearson's co-authors include Rob Anderson, Ruth Garside, Simon Briscoe, Geoff Wong, Karen Mattick, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Nicola Brennan, T Moxham, Chris Cooper and Richard Byng and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark Pearson

85 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • General Health Professions 802
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 447
  • Clinical Psychology 258
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
  • Epidemiology 144
Replace Lucylynn Lizarondo with:
Lucylynn Lizarondo Australia
Lisa Hinton United Kingdom
Megan Wainwright United Kingdom
Gerry Armitage United Kingdom
Liz Croot United Kingdom
Rebecca Ganann Canada
Andreas Xyrichis United Kingdom
Caitlin N. Dorsey United States
Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt Denmark
Kathy L. Rush Canada
Lucylynn Lizarondo Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mark Pearson
Mark Pearson · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mark Pearson
Mark Pearson · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pearson. The network helps show where Mark Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Pearson. Mark Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 1
5 2
6 13
7 1
8 12
9 4
10 8
11 5
12 15
13 21
14 44
15 12
16 58
17 8
18 6
19 20
20 23

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026