Deborah Lancastle

776 total citations
28 papers, 496 citations indexed

About

Deborah Lancastle is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Genetics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Lancastle has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 496 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 8 papers in Genetics and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Deborah Lancastle's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (4 papers). Deborah Lancastle is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (4 papers). Deborah Lancastle collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and United States. Deborah Lancastle's co-authors include Jacky Boivin, Nicky Lewis, Philip John Tyson, Emma Tonkin, Maggie Kirk, Kate Brain, Bev John, Juping Yu, Siva Ganesh and Ceri Phelps and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Lancastle

26 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Lancastle United Kingdom 12 211 170 99 79 73 28 496
Azadeh Ghaheri Iran 13 311 1.5× 172 1.0× 58 0.6× 87 1.1× 160 2.2× 40 537
Sharon N. Covington United States 10 450 2.1× 216 1.3× 207 2.1× 77 1.0× 101 1.4× 25 637
Carolyn Finck Colombia 12 80 0.4× 126 0.7× 68 0.7× 128 1.6× 30 0.4× 26 560
Shirlene Badger United Kingdom 12 125 0.6× 79 0.5× 236 2.4× 137 1.7× 93 1.3× 17 607
A Möller Sweden 10 233 1.1× 196 1.2× 125 1.3× 46 0.6× 100 1.4× 15 459
H Scherg Germany 9 218 1.0× 173 1.0× 31 0.3× 40 0.5× 124 1.7× 12 380
Behnaz Navid Iran 14 263 1.2× 199 1.2× 74 0.7× 106 1.3× 137 1.9× 28 514
Dorte Hvidtjørn Denmark 16 263 1.2× 586 3.4× 149 1.5× 191 2.4× 63 0.9× 44 886
Jennifer Nicoloro‐SantaBarbara United States 11 72 0.3× 92 0.5× 131 1.3× 147 1.9× 19 0.3× 23 437
Martina Rauchfuß Germany 17 372 1.8× 108 0.6× 352 3.6× 165 2.1× 10 0.1× 51 872

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Lancastle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Lancastle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Lancastle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Lancastle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Lancastle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Lancastle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Lancastle. The network helps show where Deborah Lancastle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Lancastle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Lancastle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Lancastle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Lancastle. Deborah Lancastle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gill, J. M., et al.. (2025). Walking football: a scoping review. Soccer and Society. 26(8). 1511–1549.
3.
Lancastle, Deborah, et al.. (2024). A systematic review of interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation in children, adolescents, and adults. 34(3). 100505–100505. 4 indexed citations
4.
Lancastle, Deborah, et al.. (2023). Development of a brief menstrual quality of life measure for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. BMC Women s Health. 23(1). 7 indexed citations
5.
Yu, Juping, Siva Ganesh, & Deborah Lancastle. (2023). Psychometric evaluation of the ‘Jefferson Scale of Empathy’ in a sample of nursing students in the United Kingdom. Nursing Open. 11(1). e2054–e2054. 6 indexed citations
6.
John, Bev, et al.. (2023). Symptom monitoring improves physical and emotional outcomes during menopause: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 30(3). 267–274. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lancastle, Deborah, et al.. (2023). Does Health & Her app use improve menopausal symptoms? A longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 13(12). e077185–e077185. 5 indexed citations
9.
Lancastle, Deborah, et al.. (2021). Review: Physical activity interventions for the mental health and well‐being of adolescents – a systematic review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 26(4). 357–368. 59 indexed citations
10.
John, Bev, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the Effects of Symptom Monitoring on Menopausal Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 757706–757706. 10 indexed citations
11.
Yu, Juping, G. Parsons, Deborah Lancastle, Emma Tonkin, & Siva Ganesh. (2021). “Walking in Their Shoes”: The effects of an immersive digital story intervention on empathy in nursing students. Nursing Open. 8(5). 2813–2823. 18 indexed citations
12.
Emmerson, Chris, et al.. (2017). The Effectiveness of Brief Information and Self-Efficacy-Based Interventions in Influencing Snack Choices in Homeless Individuals. Frontiers in Public Health. 5. 293–293. 5 indexed citations
13.
Roderique‐Davies, Gareth, et al.. (2016). Models of health behaviour predict intention to use long-acting reversible contraception. Women s Health. 12(6). 507–512. 12 indexed citations
14.
Lifford, Kate, Alison Clements, Lindsay Fraser, Deborah Lancastle, & Kate Brain. (2012). Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study. Familial Cancer. 12(1). 19–26. 6 indexed citations
15.
Brain, Kate, Kate Lifford, Lindsay Fraser, et al.. (2012). Psychological outcomes of familial ovarian cancer screening: No evidence of long-term harm. Gynecologic Oncology. 127(3). 556–563. 15 indexed citations
16.
Lancastle, Deborah, Kate Brain, & Ceri Phelps. (2011). Illness representations and distress in women undergoing screening for familial ovarian cancer. Psychology and Health. 26(12). 1659–1677. 11 indexed citations
17.
Lifford, Kate, Lindsay Fraser, Adam N. Rosenthal, et al.. (2011). Withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery: Findings from a psychological evaluation study (PsyFOCS). Gynecologic Oncology. 124(1). 158–163. 12 indexed citations
18.
Clua, Elísabet, Núria Parera, Inmaculada Rodríguez, et al.. (2008). Session 03: Psychology. Human Reproduction. 23(Supplement 1). i4–i7. 1 indexed citations
19.
Lancastle, Deborah & Jacky Boivin. (2008). A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment. Human Reproduction. 23(10). 2299–2307. 62 indexed citations
20.
Lancastle, Deborah & Jacky Boivin. (2005). Dispositional Optimism, Trait Anxiety, and Coping: Unique or Shared Effects on Biological Response to Fertility Treatment?. Health Psychology. 24(2). 171–178. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026