Jacqui Gath

1.4k citations
22 papers · 306 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jacqui Gath

20 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Jacqui Gath
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 45
  • Cancer Research 49
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
  • Reproductive Medicine 23
  • Oncology 68
Replace Xiuni Gan with:
Xiuni Gan China
Leslie G. Bluman United States
Maurice J. D. L. van der Vorst Netherlands
Terrah J. Paul Olson United States
Corinne Woods United States
John D. Cowan United States
Qixuan Li Canada
Barry Boston United States
Mark Pasetka Canada
Jacqui Gath relative to Xiuni Gan China Xiuni Gan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Xiuni Gan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacqui Gath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqui Gath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqui Gath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqui Gath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqui Gath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqui Gath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqui Gath. The network helps show where Jacqui Gath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacqui Gath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacqui Gath Line = papers co-authored together Jacqui Gath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201589
2 202261
3 202342
4 201429
5 201727
6 201417
7 20229
8 20206
9 20225
10 20244
11 20243
12 20243
13 20223
14 20252
15 20231
16 20241
17 20231
18 20211
19 20161
20 20151

About Jacqui Gath

Jacqui Gath is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (45 citations), Cancer Research (49 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations), Reproductive Medicine (23 citations) and Oncology (68 citations). Jacqui Gath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Dodwell, Michael H. Nathanson, Beth Stuart, Kerri Beckmann, Anthony Ingold, Sharon Drake, Michael J. Galsworthy, James Bundred, Leanne Metcalf and Thomas Pinkney. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Geriatric Oncology, Lung Cancer, Nutrients and British Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact