Jacqui Gath

1.4k total citations
22 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Jacqui Gath is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacqui Gath has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Oncology, 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Jacqui Gath's work include Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). Jacqui Gath is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). Jacqui Gath collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Jacqui Gath's co-authors include Leanne Metcalf, Michael P. W. Grocott, Karen Collins, Michael H. Nathanson, David Dodwell, Michael J. Galsworthy, Ramsey Cutress, Jane E. Dahlstrom, Kerri Beckmann and Sharon Drake and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, BMJ and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Jacqui Gath

20 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jacqui Gath United Kingdom 7 103 68 58 56 51 22 306
Terrah J. Paul Olson United States 8 143 1.4× 111 1.6× 79 1.4× 40 0.7× 28 0.5× 19 325
Rhea Liang Australia 11 103 1.0× 122 1.8× 116 2.0× 78 1.4× 40 0.8× 28 448
Dimelza Osorio Spain 9 103 1.0× 55 0.8× 47 0.8× 36 0.6× 40 0.8× 26 355
Gilberto Morgan‐Villela Mexico 12 62 0.6× 111 1.6× 38 0.7× 38 0.7× 11 0.2× 28 311
Teresa Dias Portugal 11 99 1.0× 171 2.5× 27 0.5× 21 0.4× 18 0.4× 28 411
Leslie G. Bluman United States 8 159 1.5× 150 2.2× 66 1.1× 60 1.1× 137 2.7× 8 625
Rola Hamood Israel 9 63 0.6× 161 2.4× 26 0.4× 16 0.3× 62 1.2× 9 354
Hatem Hamood Israel 11 68 0.7× 159 2.3× 27 0.5× 15 0.3× 75 1.5× 11 343
Maurice J. D. L. van der Vorst Netherlands 11 53 0.5× 133 2.0× 113 1.9× 61 1.1× 12 0.2× 20 422
Clara Fitzgerald United States 11 79 0.8× 79 1.2× 38 0.7× 35 0.6× 73 1.4× 22 379

Countries citing papers authored by Jacqui Gath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqui Gath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqui Gath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqui Gath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqui Gath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqui Gath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqui Gath. The network helps show where Jacqui Gath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacqui Gath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacqui Gath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacqui Gath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacqui Gath. Jacqui Gath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Michael, Sarah, et al.. (2026). Distant recurrence and margin involvement in invasive breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 134(5). 772–780.
2.
Morgan, Jenna, Anne Shrestha, Charlene Martin, et al.. (2025). Preferences for quality of life versus length of life in older women deciding about treatment for early breast cancer: A cross-sectional sub-analysis of the Bridging the Age Gap study. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 16(4). 102226–102226. 2 indexed citations
4.
McIntosh, Stuart, et al.. (2024). Understanding Patient Experiences to Inform Future Studies to Optimize Personalization of Treatment for Early Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 31(9). 5870–5879. 4 indexed citations
5.
Woolf, David, Nichola Downs, Chris Sutton, et al.. (2024). 209 ThOracic Umbrella RadIotherapy STudy in stage IV NSCLC: TOURIST. Lung Cancer. 190. 107770–107770. 1 indexed citations
7.
Alderman, Joseph, Elinor Laws, Joanne Palmer, et al.. (2024). Revealing transparency gaps in publicly available COVID-19 datasets used for medical artificial intelligence development—a systematic review. The Lancet Digital Health. 6(11). e827–e847. 3 indexed citations
8.
Middleton, Gary, Lynley V. Marshall, Lucinda Billingham, et al.. (2023). 716TiP DETERMINE: A pioneering UK precision medicine trial for rare cancers. Annals of Oncology. 34. S494–S495. 1 indexed citations
9.
Sidhu, Reena, Hasan Haboubi, John Leeds, et al.. (2023). British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 73(2). 1–27. 42 indexed citations
10.
Philipps, L., Stephanie L. Foster, Jacqui Gath, et al.. (2023). Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE): study protocol for a partially randomised patient preference study. BMJ Open. 13(9). e073817–e073817. 1 indexed citations
11.
Bundred, James, Sarah Michael, Beth Stuart, et al.. (2022). Margin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 378. e070346–e070346. 61 indexed citations
12.
Winter, Matthew, Rob Coleman, Carlo Palmieri, et al.. (2022). A phase IB and randomised phase IIA trial of CApecitabine plus Radium-223 (Xofigo™) in breast cancer patients with BONe metastases: CARBON trial results. Journal of bone oncology. 35. 100442–100442. 9 indexed citations
13.
Lally, Phillippa, Anna Roberts, Rebecca J. Beeken, et al.. (2022). An app with brief behavioural support to promote physical activity after a cancer diagnosis (APPROACH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 8(1). 74–74. 5 indexed citations
14.
Hanley, Bec, et al.. (2021). Formalising the induction of patient and public involvement contributors on trial oversight committees. Research Involvement and Engagement. 7(1). 42–42. 1 indexed citations
15.
Martin, Charlene, Jenna Morgan, Esther Herbert, et al.. (2020). Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: The Age Gap Trial. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 12(5). 714–723. 6 indexed citations
17.
Nepogodiev, Dmitri, Rebecca J. Howard, Shri Pathmakanthan, et al.. (2016). The ACCURE-UK trial: The effect of appendectomy on the clinical course of ulcerative colitis – A feasibility study. International Journal of Surgery. 36. S36–S36. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ahmedzai, Sam H., Robert Milroy, Lucinda Billingham, et al.. (2015). 185: The SPECIAL trial: exploring the place of early specialist palliative care in UK lung cancer management. Lung Cancer. 87. S69–S69. 1 indexed citations
20.
Collins, Karen, et al.. (2014). Making patient and public involvement in cancer and palliative research a reality: academic support is vital for success. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 5(2). 203–206. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026