Kate Brain
Impact in
- Oncology top 2%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Papers in ⓘ
- Oncology 52
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 44
- Cancer survivorship and care 8
- Co-authors
- Paul Norman (4 shared papers)Fiona Wood (18 shared papers)Grace McCutchan (22 shared papers)Jonathon Gray (9 shared papers)Glyn Elwyn (6 shared papers)Adrian Edwards (6 shared papers)Lindsay Forbes (6 shared papers)Kate Lifford (16 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psycho-Oncology (9 papers)BMJ Open (9 papers)British Journal of Cancer (7 papers)Health Expectations (5 papers)BMC Cancer (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Kate Brain
102 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Oncology 1.3k
- General Health Professions 851
- Applied Psychology 154
- Otorhinolaryngology 125
- Genetics 731
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Brain
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Brain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Brain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Brain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Brain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Brain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Brain. The network helps show where Kate Brain may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Brain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 330 |
| 2 | 2013 | 166 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 143 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 110 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 103 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 97 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 95 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 89 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 89 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 72 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 68 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 67 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 66 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 65 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 64 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 55 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 40 |
About Kate Brain
Kate Brain is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Oncology, Genetics, Otorhinolaryngology and General Health Professions, having authored 104 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (44 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (39 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (20 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (19 papers), Family Support in Illness (17 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (10 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.3k citations), General Health Professions (851 citations), Applied Psychology (154 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (125 citations) and Genetics (731 citations). Kate Brain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul Norman, Fiona Wood, Grace McCutchan, Jonathon Gray, Glyn Elwyn, Adrian Edwards, Lindsay Forbes, Kate Lifford, Samantha L. Quaife and David Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, BMJ Open, British Journal of Cancer, Health Expectations and BMC Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.