Rachel Iredale
- Genetics top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer HilgartBernadette ColesJulie A. HaywardStephanie SivellGlyn ElwynJonathon GrayHazel ThorntonClara Gaff
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (27 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Rachel Iredale
45 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Genetics 727
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 357
- General Health Professions 249
- Sociology and Political Science 247
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 206
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Iredale
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Iredale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Iredale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Iredale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Iredale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Iredale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Iredale. The network helps show where Rachel Iredale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Iredale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Iredale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Iredale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Iredale. Rachel Iredale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 195 | |
| 10 | An exploration of midwives' perceptions about their role | 5 |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Rachel Iredale
Rachel Iredale is a scholar working on Genetics, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (27 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (727 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (357 citations) and Medical Terminology (3 citations). Rachel Iredale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Hilgart, Bernadette Coles, Julie A. Hayward, Stephanie Sivell, Glyn Elwyn, Jonathon Gray, Hazel Thornton, Clara Gaff, Joanna Dundon and Adrian Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British Journal of Cancer and European Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.