Bethan J. Henderson

814 total citations
17 papers, 616 citations indexed

About

Bethan J. Henderson is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Bethan J. Henderson has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 616 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Genetics, 10 papers in Oncology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Bethan J. Henderson's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (11 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers). Bethan J. Henderson is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (11 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers). Bethan J. Henderson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Bethan J. Henderson's co-authors include Joan Austoker, Clare Bankhead, Jo Brett, E. Watson, B Maguire, Eila Watson, Kate Brain, Sally Tyndel, Alison Clements and Alix Hall and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Social Science & Medicine and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Bethan J. Henderson

16 papers receiving 587 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bethan J. Henderson United Kingdom 12 374 190 104 93 91 17 616
Beatty G. Watts United States 9 211 0.6× 345 1.8× 72 0.7× 120 1.3× 82 0.9× 10 622
Katherine Tucker Australia 14 176 0.5× 176 0.9× 91 0.9× 87 0.9× 74 0.8× 31 618
Lesley Andrews Australia 15 152 0.4× 326 1.7× 46 0.4× 95 1.0× 83 0.9× 45 562
Jonathan Roberts United Kingdom 9 231 0.6× 124 0.7× 57 0.5× 69 0.7× 40 0.4× 15 446
E.B.L. van Dorst Netherlands 12 282 0.8× 356 1.9× 38 0.4× 90 1.0× 215 2.4× 24 1.0k
Angela W. Prehn United States 10 270 0.7× 84 0.4× 56 0.5× 24 0.3× 110 1.2× 20 576
Miranda A. Gerritsma Netherlands 10 264 0.7× 80 0.4× 58 0.6× 64 0.7× 35 0.4× 12 416
Rachel Williams Australia 17 197 0.5× 316 1.7× 109 1.0× 47 0.5× 98 1.1× 35 791
Christine Garcia United States 16 141 0.4× 67 0.4× 49 0.5× 65 0.7× 74 0.8× 71 668
Alison Fry United Kingdom 14 193 0.5× 444 2.3× 128 1.2× 193 2.1× 103 1.1× 18 752

Countries citing papers authored by Bethan J. Henderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bethan J. Henderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bethan J. Henderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bethan J. Henderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bethan J. Henderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bethan J. Henderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bethan J. Henderson. The network helps show where Bethan J. Henderson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bethan J. Henderson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bethan J. Henderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bethan J. Henderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bethan J. Henderson. Bethan J. Henderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Morrison, Val, et al.. (2011). Common, important, and unmet needs of cancer outpatients. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 16(2). 115–123. 66 indexed citations
2.
Morrison, Val, et al.. (2010). The Impact of Information Order on Intentions to Undergo Predictive Genetic Testing. Journal of Health Psychology. 15(7). 1082–1092. 11 indexed citations
3.
Tyndel, Sally, Alison Clements, Clare Bankhead, et al.. (2008). Mammographic screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer: knowledge and views of those at risk. British Journal of Cancer. 99(7). 1007–1012. 12 indexed citations
4.
Brain, Kate, Bethan J. Henderson, Sally Tyndel, et al.. (2008). Predictors of breast cancer‐related distress following mammography screening in younger women on a family history breast screening programme. Psycho-Oncology. 17(12). 1180–1188. 29 indexed citations
5.
Clements, Alison, Bethan J. Henderson, Sally Tyndel, et al.. (2008). Diagnosed with breast cancer whilst on a family history screening programme: an exploratory qualitative study. Breast Cancer Research. 10(S2). 3 indexed citations
6.
Clements, Alison, Sally Tyndel, Bethan J. Henderson, et al.. (2008). 'More positive about mammography' – reactions of women to a false positive recall: a qualitative study of women at risk of familial breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research. 10(S2). 1 indexed citations
7.
Henderson, Bethan J., Sally Tyndel, Kate Brain, et al.. (2007). Factors associated with breast cancer‐specific distress in younger women participating in a family history mammography screening programme. Psycho-Oncology. 17(1). 74–82. 22 indexed citations
8.
Clements, Alison, Bethan J. Henderson, Sally Tyndel, et al.. (2007). Diagnosed with breast cancer while on a family history screening programme: an exploratory qualitative study. European Journal of Cancer Care. 17(3). 245–252. 13 indexed citations
9.
Tyndel, Sally, Joan Austoker, Bethan J. Henderson, et al.. (2007). What Is the Psychological Impact of Mammographic Screening on Younger Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer? Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study by the PIMMS Management Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 25(25). 3823–3830. 72 indexed citations
10.
Henderson, Bethan J., B Maguire, Jonathon Gray, & Valerie Morrison. (2006). How people make decisions about predictive genetic testing: An analogue study. Psychology and Health. 21(4). 513–539. 5 indexed citations
11.
Watson, Eila, Bethan J. Henderson, Jo Brett, Clare Bankhead, & Joan Austoker. (2005). The psychological impact of mammographic screening on women with a family history of breast cancer—a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. 14(11). 939–948. 43 indexed citations
12.
Brett, Jo, Clare Bankhead, Bethan J. Henderson, E. Watson, & Joan Austoker. (2005). The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology. 14(11). 917–938. 253 indexed citations
13.
Henderson, Bethan J. & B Maguire. (2000). Three lay mental models of disease inheritance. Social Science & Medicine. 50(2). 293–301. 46 indexed citations
14.
Henderson, Bethan J. & B Maguire. (1998). Lay Representations of Genetic Disease, and Predictive Testing. Journal of Health Psychology. 3(2). 233–241. 14 indexed citations
15.
Henderson, Bethan J. & Cynthia Whissell. (1997). Changes in Women's Emotions as a Function of Emotion Valence, Self-Determined Category of Premenstrual Distress, and Day in the Menstrual Cycle. Psychological Reports. 80(3_suppl). 1272–1274. 14 indexed citations
16.
Roux, B. T. Le, et al.. (1974). Thoracocervical cysts as a cause of stridor. Thorax. 29(5). 564–566. 1 indexed citations
17.
Henderson, Bethan J., A S Mitha, B. T. Le Roux, & Mervyn S. Gotsman. (1973). Haemolysis related to mitral valve replacement with the Beall valve prosthesis. Thorax. 28(4). 488–491. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026