Amanda Ramirez
- Oncology top 2%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 18
- Cancer survivorship and care 8
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 7
- Cancer Risks and Factors 5
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 6
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 6
- Applied Psychology top 10%
-
- Family Support in Illness 6
-
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 4
- Co-authors
- Caroline BurgessMichael A. RichardsJill GrahamSharon LoveVictoria CorneliusMyra S. HunterLindsay ForbesHenry Potts
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Screening (4 papers)Psycho-Oncology (3 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Amanda Ramirez
37 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Oncology 1.6k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 491
- General Health Professions 589
- Complementary and alternative medicine 127
- Applied Psychology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Ramirez
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Ramirez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Ramirez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Ramirez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Ramirez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Ramirez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Ramirez. The network helps show where Amanda Ramirez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Ramirez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 8 | RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEG DOMINANCE TESTS AND TYPE OF TASK | 2011 | 33 |
| 9 | 2010 | 116 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 65 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 142 | |
| 15 | Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort studybreakdown → | 2005 | 1017 |
| 16 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 50 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 16 |
About Amanda Ramirez
Amanda Ramirez is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (18 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (5 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.6k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (491 citations) and General Health Professions (589 citations). Amanda Ramirez has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Burgess, Michael A. Richards, Jill Graham, Sharon Love, Victoria Cornelius, Myra S. Hunter, Lindsay Forbes, Henry Potts, Cath Taylor and Elizabeth A. Grunfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Screening, Psycho-Oncology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.