Kate Bosanquet

693 citations
18 papers · 303 indexed · h-index 10

Kate Bosanquet

17 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Kate Bosanquet
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Pharmacy 48
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Health Information Management 30
  • Emergency Medical Services 39
  • General Health Professions 109
Replace Glenda Parmenter with:
Glenda Parmenter Australia
Ingela Berggren Sweden
Kia Skrine Jeffers United States
Kathleen Blais United States
Maram Banakhar Saudi Arabia
Mieko Omura Australia
Patti Rager Zuzelo United States
Ognjen Brborović Croatia
Sandra Benavides‐Vaello United States
Yong-Hee Han South Korea
Kate Bosanquet relative to Glenda Parmenter Australia Glenda Parmenter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Glenda Parmenter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Bosanquet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Bosanquet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Bosanquet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Bosanquet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Bosanquet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Bosanquet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Bosanquet. The network helps show where Kate Bosanquet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Bosanquet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Bosanquet Line = papers co-authored together Kate Bosanquet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20228
3 20218
4 201829
5 201815
6 20181
7 201722
8 20164
9 201568
10 201520
11 20156
12 201414
13 201410
14 201429
15
Detailed statement for reflexivity
20142
16 201317
17 20137
18
Keeping Personal Budgets Personal: Learning from the experiences of older people, people with mental health problems and their carers
201143

About Kate Bosanquet

Kate Bosanquet is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (48 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations) and Health Information Management (30 citations). Kate Bosanquet has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon Gilbody, Della Bailey, Melissa Harden, Dean McMillan, Reema Harrison, Yvonne Birks, Rick Iedema, Laura Manea, Helen Lewis and David Torgerson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, BMC Family Practice, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026