Laura Manea

5.7k total citations · 3 hit papers
18 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Laura Manea is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Laura Manea has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Laura Manea's work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). Laura Manea is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). Laura Manea collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Romania and United States. Laura Manea's co-authors include Dean McMillan, Simon Gilbody, Faye Plummer, Dominic Trépel, Andrew S. Moriarty, Catherine Hewitt, Rachel Richardson, Bethany Williams, Brett D. Thombs and Kate Bosanquet and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Canadian Medical Association Journal and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Laura Manea

17 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the ... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 2015 2014 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laura Manea United Kingdom 10 1.7k 890 814 684 545 18 3.9k
Joyce T. Berry United States 16 1.7k 1.0× 1.0k 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 710 1.0× 622 1.1× 19 5.0k
Kerstin Gräfe Germany 10 1.4k 0.8× 844 0.9× 759 0.9× 587 0.9× 434 0.8× 11 3.7k
Yuan‐Pang Wang Brazil 27 1.5k 0.9× 767 0.9× 657 0.8× 641 0.9× 451 0.8× 121 3.9k
Donald Edmondson United States 39 2.5k 1.5× 785 0.9× 1.2k 1.5× 476 0.7× 571 1.0× 148 6.1k
Jeffrey A. Cully United States 34 1.2k 0.7× 846 1.0× 1.0k 1.2× 527 0.8× 230 0.4× 114 3.3k
Karen L. Weihs United States 39 1.3k 0.7× 873 1.0× 726 0.9× 534 0.8× 604 1.1× 111 5.3k
Sarah S. Jaser United States 41 2.4k 1.4× 684 0.8× 915 1.1× 679 1.0× 524 1.0× 115 6.4k
Thomas Ten Have United States 36 1.3k 0.7× 889 1.0× 845 1.0× 809 1.2× 549 1.0× 59 6.3k
John W. Jackson United States 26 1.1k 0.7× 830 0.9× 730 0.9× 370 0.5× 461 0.8× 83 4.2k
Lela R. McKnight-Eily United States 25 1.0k 0.6× 574 0.6× 1.0k 1.2× 650 1.0× 554 1.0× 42 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Manea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Manea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Manea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Manea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Manea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Manea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Manea. The network helps show where Laura Manea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Manea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Manea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Manea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Manea. Laura Manea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Manea, Laura, et al.. (2021). Adult Onset Still Disease. 18(2). 79–87. 1 indexed citations
3.
Manea, Laura, Jan R. Boehnke, Simon Gilbody, Andrew S. Moriarty, & Dean McMillan. (2017). Are there researcher allegiance effects in diagnostic validation studies of the PHQ-9? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 7(9). e015247–e015247. 22 indexed citations
4.
Manea, Laura, et al.. (2017). The embodied simulation account of cognition in Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. New Ideas in Psychology. 48. 12–20. 10 indexed citations
5.
Manea, Laura, Simon Gilbody, Catherine Hewitt, et al.. (2016). Identifying depression with the PHQ-2: A diagnostic meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 203. 382–395. 165 indexed citations
6.
Gilbody, Simon, et al.. (2016). The diagnostic accuracy of brief versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 31(8). 837–857. 168 indexed citations
7.
Bosanquet, Kate, Della Bailey, Simon Gilbody, et al.. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of the Whooley questions for the identification of depression: a diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 5(12). e008913–e008913. 68 indexed citations
8.
Moriarty, Andrew S., Simon Gilbody, Dean McMillan, & Laura Manea. (2015). Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry. 37(6). 567–576. 237 indexed citations
9.
Plummer, Faye, Laura Manea, Dominic Trépel, & Dean McMillan. (2015). Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. General Hospital Psychiatry. 39. 24–31. 1198 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Wright, Barry, Melissa Barry, Ellen Hughes, et al.. (2015). Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of parenting interventions for children with severe attachment problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Technology Assessment. 19(52). 1–348. 29 indexed citations
11.
McMillan, Dean, et al.. (2015). The Diagnostic Accuracy of Brief and Ultra-brief Versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a Meta-analysis. European Psychiatry. 30. 1437–1437. 2 indexed citations
12.
Wright, Barry, Melissa Barry, Ellen Hughes, et al.. (2015). Full search strategy.
13.
Wright, Barry, Melissa Barry, Ellen Hughes, et al.. (2015). Cochrane risk of bias tool. 5 indexed citations
14.
Wright, Barry, et al.. (2015). What can Comprehensive Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Achieve in People with Spider Phobia? - A Case Series. 2 indexed citations
15.
Richardson, Rachel, Dominic Trépel, Amanda Perry, et al.. (2015). Screening for psychological and mental health difficulties in young people who offend: a systematic review and decision model. Health Technology Assessment. 19(1). 1–128. 6 indexed citations
16.
Manea, Laura, Simon Gilbody, & Dean McMillan. (2014). A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression. General Hospital Psychiatry. 37(1). 67–75. 567 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Wright, Barry, Ben Alderson‐Day, Garreth Prendergast, et al.. (2013). Neural correlation of successful cognitive behaviour therapy for spider phobia: A magnetoencephalography study. Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging. 214(3). 444–451. 4 indexed citations
18.
Manea, Laura, Simon Gilbody, & Dean McMillan. (2011). Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 184(3). E191–E196. 1447 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026