Alex Mitchell

21 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Alex Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Applied Psychology 13
  • Health 14
  • Physiology 43
  • Social Psychology 32
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 43
Replace Elaine Y. L. Tsui with:
Elaine Y. L. Tsui Canada
Andrei Shpakou Belarus
Robin Chatters United Kingdom
Christina Bricker United States
Sophia Rosman France
Molly McCarthy United States
Pip Youl Australia
Magali Steinecker France
Barbara Jankowiak Poland
Jinnan Xiao China
Alex Mitchell relative to Elaine Y. L. Tsui Canada Elaine Y. L. Tsui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Elaine Y. L. Tsui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alex Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Mitchell. The network helps show where Alex Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alex Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alex Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Alex Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202224
2 202122
3 201822
4 201921
5 202418
6 202017
7 202416
8 202011
9 20209
10 20209
11 20218
12 20206
13 20194
14 20234
15 20233
16 20203
17 20193
18 20202
19 20152
20 20231

About Alex Mitchell

Alex Mitchell is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (13 citations), Health (14 citations), Physiology (43 citations), Social Psychology (32 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (43 citations). Alex Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include David Torgerson, Catherine Hewitt, Ada Keding, Lorna Fraser, Jo Taylor, Laura Clark, Ruth Hall, Michael Ussher, Judith Watson and Frank Kee. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Tobacco Induced Diseases, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Trials and American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact