Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Time Series Analysis with Clean - Part One - Derivation of a Spectrum
1987559 citationsD. H. Roberts, Joseph Lehár et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. H. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. H. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. H. Roberts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. H. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. H. Roberts. The network helps show where D. H. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. H. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. H. Roberts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. H. Roberts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. H. Roberts. D. H. Roberts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Roberts, D. H., et al.. (2020). Quantifying written ambiguities in tone languages: A comparative study of Elip, Mbelime, and Eastern Dan. Language documentation and conservation. 14. 108–138.1 indexed citations
3.
Yusef‐Zadeh, F., D. H. Roberts, W. D. Cotton, et al.. (2014). Brightening of the Magnetar SGR J1745-29 near Sgr A* at 44 GHz. ATel. 6041. 1.2 indexed citations
4.
Roberts, D. H.. (2011). A tone orthography typology. Written Language & Literacy. 14(1). 82–108.3 indexed citations
Evans, James, et al.. (2007). Made in...? Appreciating the everyday geographies of connected lives. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).7 indexed citations
7.
Wardle, J. F. C., D. C. Homan, C. C. Cheung, & D. H. Roberts. (2005). The Ultra-Fast Quasar PKS 1510-089: Direct Evidence for a Changing Orientation of the Central Engine. ASPC. 340. 67.
Roberts, D. H., J. F. C. Wardle, T. V. Cawthorne, & L. F. Brown. (1993). Interpretation of VLBI Kinematic and Polarization Data: Application to 3C345. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 183.1 indexed citations
Wardle, J. F. C. & D. H. Roberts. (1988). The Linear Polarization of Extragalactic Radio Sources at Milliarcsecond Resolution (review). 129. 143.1 indexed citations
14.
Roberts, D. H., Joseph Lehár, & J. W. Dreher. (1986). Time Series Spectral Analysis with CLEAN. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 18. 945.1 indexed citations
Schilizzi, R. T., et al.. (1984). The QUASAT Project. 110. 407.2 indexed citations
17.
Roberts, D. H., et al.. (1980). Detection of the 18 May 1980 Explosion of Mt. St. Helens by Very Long Baseline Interferometry. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 12. 814.1 indexed citations
Burke, B. F. & D. H. Roberts. (1979). VLBI in Space. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 11. 467.1 indexed citations
20.
Roberts, D. H. & P. A. Sturrock. (1971). Model of Pulsar Magnetospheres.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 3. 463.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.