Karine Thoreux
About
In The Last Decade
Karine Thoreux
9 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Molecular Biology 184
- Food Science 146
- Immunology 73
- Nutrition and Dietetics 71
- Genetics 66
Countries citing papers authored by Karine Thoreux
This map shows the geographic impact of Karine Thoreux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karine Thoreux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karine Thoreux more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karine Thoreux
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karine Thoreux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karine Thoreux. The network helps show where Karine Thoreux may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karine Thoreux
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karine Thoreux. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karine Thoreux based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karine Thoreux. Karine Thoreux is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 112 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 65 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 17 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.