Karen McArdle
- Clinical Psychology
- Education top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tom HarrisonLisa IversenMike CrillyTerry PorteousMarjorie C. JohnstonAlison D. MurrayChristopher BurtonAlison M. Elliott
- Topics
- Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers)Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Karen McArdle
22 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Clinical Psychology 104
- Education 101
- General Health Professions 52
- Sociology and Political Science 36
- Public Administration 36
Countries citing papers authored by Karen McArdle
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen McArdle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen McArdle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen McArdle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen McArdle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen McArdle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen McArdle. The network helps show where Karen McArdle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen McArdle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen McArdle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen McArdle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen McArdle. Karen McArdle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Contradictions between wanting to and being able to practice food shopping: the experiences of 'vulnerable' young people in the North East of Scotland. | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Lifelong learning professionals need to ensure disadvantaged groups have access to e-learning: “Reflexivity” is required | 1 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | What makes teachers good at what they do?: The axiological model | 4 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Statistics and Stories: Generating Evidence of Youth Work Effectiveness | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 55 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Karen McArdle
Karen McArdle is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Public Administration and Education, having authored 24 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (36 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (18 citations) and Clinical Psychology (104 citations). Karen McArdle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tom Harrison, Lisa Iversen, Mike Crilly, Terry Porteous, Marjorie C. Johnston, Alison D. Murray, Christopher Burton, Alison M. Elliott, Louise H. Phillips and Corri Black. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Microbiology, Psychosomatics and Child & Family Social Work.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.