Trends in Microbiology

3.5k papers and 255.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Trends in Microbiology in the last decades have received a total of 255.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Microbiology usually cover Molecular Biology (1.4k papers), Infectious Diseases (818 papers) and Genetics (645 papers) specifically the topics of Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (369 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (325 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (264 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Microbiology are George A. O’Toole, Rodney D. Berg, Duane J. Gubler, Laura Douglas, I.A. Sutherland, Robert E. W. Hancock, Marc Ongena, Philippe Jacques, Neil A. R. Gow and Craig Baker‐Austin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in Microbiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Microbiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Microbiology.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Microbiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Microbiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Microbiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Microbiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025