Child & Family Social Work

1.8k papers and 32.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Child & Family Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 32.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Child & Family Social Work usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Safety Research (827 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (696 papers) specifically the topics of Child Welfare and Adoption (787 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (713 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (432 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Child & Family Social Work are David Berridge, Mike Stein, Cathy Humphreys, Harry Ferguson, Robbie Gilligan, Georgia Spiliopoulos, Mark E. Courtney, Gillian Ruch, Viviene E. Cree and Amy Dworsky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Child & Family Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Child & Family Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Child & Family Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Child & Family Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Child & Family Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Child & Family Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child & Family Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025