Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations: From Cartography to Process
2019235 citationsAnn Langley, Kajsa Lindberg et al.Academy of Management Annalsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kajsa Lindberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kajsa Lindberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kajsa Lindberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kajsa Lindberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kajsa Lindberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kajsa Lindberg. The network helps show where Kajsa Lindberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kajsa Lindberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kajsa Lindberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kajsa Lindberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kajsa Lindberg. Kajsa Lindberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Langley, Ann, Kajsa Lindberg, Bjørn Erik Mørk, et al.. (2019). Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations: From Cartography to Process. Academy of Management Annals. 13(2). 704–736.235 indexed citations breakdown →
Lindberg, Kajsa, et al.. (2014). Participatory Design with Preschool Children: A Smartphone Application Concept. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology).2 indexed citations
10.
Lindberg, Kajsa, Alexander Styhre, & Lars Walter. (2012). Assembling Health Care Organizations: Practice, Materiality and Institutions. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology).2 indexed citations
11.
Lindberg, Kajsa, Alexander Styhre, & Lars Walter. (2012). Assembling Health Care Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks.2 indexed citations
12.
Nicolini, Davide, et al.. (2009). Institutional logics and material practices : international comparisons of retail pharmacy.2 indexed citations
13.
Lindberg, Kajsa, et al.. (2009). Mellan offentligt och privat : om styrning, praktik och intressen i hälso- och sjukvården.1 indexed citations
Lindberg, Kajsa, et al.. (2009). Mellan offentligt och privat i hälso- och sjukvården. 11–19.
16.
Czarniawska, Barbara, Andreas Diedrich, Ulla Eriksson‐Zetterquist, et al.. (2007). Organisering kring hot och risk. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology).2 indexed citations
Lindberg, Kajsa. (2002). Kopplandets kraft. Om organisering mellan organisationer. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University).16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.