J.V. Roberts
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Law top 2%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Michael HoughNorval MorrisDavid IndermaurLoretta J. StalansMichael TonryMike HoughJessica JacobsonPaul Connolly
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers)Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
J.V. Roberts
13 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Sociology and Political Science 301
- Clinical Psychology 106
- Political Science and International Relations 82
- Law 57
- General Health Professions 42
Countries citing papers authored by J.V. Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of J.V. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.V. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.V. Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.V. Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.V. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.V. Roberts. The network helps show where J.V. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.V. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.V. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.V. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J.V. Roberts. J.V. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Individualisation at sentencing: the effects of guidelines and "preferred" numbers | 5 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Personal mitigation, public opinion and sentencing guidelines in England and Wales | 2 |
| 9 | Public attitudes to the principles of sentencing | 8 |
| 10 | Public attitudes to sentencing offences involving death by driving | 7 |
| 11 | Attitudes to the sentencing of offences involving death by driving | 4 |
| 12 | Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries | 316 |
| 13 | 1 |
About J.V. Roberts
J.V. Roberts is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (301 citations), Law (57 citations) and Clinical Psychology (106 citations). J.V. Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Michael Hough, Norval Morris, David Indermaur, Loretta J. Stalans, Michael Tonry, Mike Hough, Jessica Jacobson, Paul Connolly, José Pina-Sánchez and Karen Winter. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Qualitative Social Work and Campbell Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.