José Pina-Sánchez
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Law top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ian Brunton‐SmithIan PlewisJohan KoskinenDavid Buil‐GilGuangquan LiJulian RobertsJulian V. RobertsAlexandru Cernat
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (26 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (26 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial Science ResearchLaw and Human Behavior
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandCzechia
In The Last Decade
José Pina-Sánchez
39 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Sociology and Political Science 300
- Clinical Psychology 99
- Law 74
- Economics and Econometrics 70
- Political Science and International Relations 66
Countries citing papers authored by José Pina-Sánchez
This map shows the geographic impact of José Pina-Sánchez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Pina-Sánchez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Pina-Sánchez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Pina-Sánchez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Pina-Sánchez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Pina-Sánchez. The network helps show where José Pina-Sánchez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Pina-Sánchez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Pina-Sánchez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Pina-Sánchez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Pina-Sánchez. José Pina-Sánchez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Individualisation at sentencing: the effects of guidelines and "preferred" numbers | 5 |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | Decentralization as a multifaceted concept: a more encompassing index using bayesian statistics | 8 |
| 19 | The Role of Previous Convictions at Sentencing in the Crown Court: Some New Answers to an Old Question | 3 |
| 20 | Implications of Retrospective Measurement Error in Event History Analysis | 6 |
About José Pina-Sánchez
José Pina-Sánchez is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (26 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (26 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (74 citations), Sociology and Political Science (300 citations) and Clinical Psychology (99 citations). José Pina-Sánchez has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Ian Brunton‐Smith, Ian Plewis, Johan Koskinen, David Buil‐Gil, Guangquan Li, Julian Roberts, Julian V. Roberts, Alexandru Cernat, John Paul Gosling and Linda Harris. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science Research and Law and Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.