Meredith Rossner

858 total citations
32 papers, 365 citations indexed

About

Meredith Rossner is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Meredith Rossner has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 365 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Law, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Meredith Rossner's work include Law in Society and Culture (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers). Meredith Rossner is often cited by papers focused on Law in Society and Culture (15 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers). Meredith Rossner collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Meredith Rossner's co-authors include David S. Tait, Martha L. McCurdy, Geoffrey C. Barnes, Lawrence W. Sherman, Daniel J. Woods, Caroline Angel, Sarah Bennett, Heather Strang, Molly Slothower and Dorothy Newbury‐Birch and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Criminology and Sociology Compass.

In The Last Decade

Meredith Rossner

29 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Meredith Rossner Australia 10 255 153 94 65 43 32 365
Theo Gavrielidés United Kingdom 12 293 1.1× 159 1.0× 92 1.0× 47 0.7× 28 0.7× 33 376
Daniel W. Van Ness Malta 9 259 1.0× 131 0.9× 79 0.8× 44 0.7× 21 0.5× 14 363
James R. Acker United States 11 242 0.9× 80 0.5× 108 1.1× 55 0.8× 69 1.6× 43 343
J.V. Roberts United Kingdom 6 301 1.2× 106 0.7× 57 0.6× 82 1.3× 15 0.3× 13 363
Julian Roberts Canada 11 318 1.2× 141 0.9× 48 0.5× 49 0.8× 12 0.3× 27 394
Christi Metcalfe United States 14 408 1.6× 118 0.8× 27 0.3× 137 2.1× 42 1.0× 37 484
Robert J. Norris United States 10 286 1.1× 114 0.7× 81 0.9× 64 1.0× 124 2.9× 28 380
Eva Mulder Netherlands 8 162 0.6× 114 0.7× 26 0.3× 27 0.4× 28 0.7× 16 259
Terry A. Maroney United States 7 133 0.5× 46 0.3× 110 1.2× 33 0.5× 80 1.9× 21 292
Lesley Noaks United Kingdom 9 204 0.8× 77 0.5× 14 0.1× 77 1.2× 36 0.8× 12 295

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Rossner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Rossner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Rossner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Rossner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Rossner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Rossner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Rossner. The network helps show where Meredith Rossner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith Rossner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith Rossner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith Rossner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith Rossner. Meredith Rossner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rossner, Meredith & David S. Tait. (2025). Emotions in the metaverse court: proposed frameworks and methodologies. 7(2). 199–216.
2.
Newman, Eryn J., et al.. (2023). The role of video background cues in the virtual court: a psychological perspective. Psychology Crime and Law. 31(2). 207–225. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rossner, Meredith, et al.. (2022). Unpacking Shame and Confucian Relationalism in Taiwanese Restorative Justice. Asian Journal of Criminology. 18(2). 209–230. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rossner, Meredith, et al.. (2021). Restorative justice during and after COVID-19. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 4(2). 305–314. 4 indexed citations
5.
Rossner, Meredith & Miranda Forsyth. (2021). Is now the time for restorative justice for survivors of sexual assault?. 4(3). 365–373. 2 indexed citations
6.
Rossner, Meredith & David S. Tait. (2021). Presence and participation in a virtual court. Criminology & Criminal Justice. 23(1). 135–157. 8 indexed citations
8.
Rossner, Meredith. (2019). Storytelling Rituals in Jury Deliberations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(5). 747–770. 5 indexed citations
9.
Karstedt, Susanne & Meredith Rossner. (2019). Understanding emotions in restorative justice: transcending myths and scepticism. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 2(3). 363–367. 3 indexed citations
10.
Rossner, Meredith & Martha L. McCurdy. (2018). Implementing Video hearings (Party-to-State): A Process Evaluation. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 5 indexed citations
11.
Rossner, Meredith, et al.. (2018). Trajectories and typologies of pre-sentence restorative justice rituals. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 51(4). 502–518. 10 indexed citations
12.
Rossner, Meredith. (2016). Does the Placement of the Accused at Court Undermine the Right to a Fair Trial. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 2 indexed citations
13.
Rossner, Meredith, et al.. (2016). Community Participation in Restorative Justice: Rituals, Reintegration, and Quasi-Professionalization. Victims & Offenders. 11(1). 107–125. 27 indexed citations
14.
Sherman, Lawrence W., Heather Strang, Geoffrey C. Barnes, et al.. (2015). Twelve experiments in restorative justice: the Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 11(4). 501–540. 51 indexed citations
15.
Tait, David S., et al.. (2015). Digital Evidence in the Jury Room: The Impact of Mobile Technology on the Jury. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 27(2). 179–194. 4 indexed citations
16.
Rossner, Meredith, David S. Tait, & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2014). Students vs. Jurors: Responding to Enhanced Video Technology. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). 618–635. 1 indexed citations
17.
Rossner, Meredith, et al.. (2013). The process and dynamics of restorative justice: research on forum sentencing. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 10 indexed citations
18.
Rossner, Meredith. (2013). Just Emotions. Oxford University Press eBooks. 40 indexed citations
19.
Rossner, Meredith. (2011). Emotions and Interaction Ritual: A Micro Analysis of Restorative Justice. The British Journal of Criminology. 51(1). 95–119. 53 indexed citations
20.
Rossner, Meredith. (2008). Why emotions work: Restorative justice, interaction ritual and the micro potential for emotional transformation. Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania). 7(4). 118–118. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026