Joshua Conrad Jackson
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michele J. GelfandKurt GrayKai Chi YamJesse R. HarringtonKristen A. LindquistJoseph WattsJohann‐Mattis ListDylan Pieper
- Topics
- Cultural Differences and Values (23 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (21 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joshua Conrad Jackson
54 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Social Psychology 919
- Sociology and Political Science 818
- Cognitive Neuroscience 495
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 281
- Clinical Psychology 229
Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Conrad Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Conrad Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Conrad Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Conrad Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Conrad Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Conrad Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Conrad Jackson. The network helps show where Joshua Conrad Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Conrad Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Conrad Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Conrad Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Conrad Jackson. Joshua Conrad Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structurebreakdown → | 229 |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Joshua Conrad Jackson
Joshua Conrad Jackson is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health and Cultural Studies, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (23 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (21 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (919 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (495 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (100 citations). Joshua Conrad Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michele J. Gelfand, Kurt Gray, Kai Chi Yam, Jesse R. Harrington, Kristen A. Lindquist, Joseph Watts, Johann‐Mattis List, Dylan Pieper, Pok Man Tang and John M. Lopes. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.