Jorge Peña

2.1k citations
51 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jorge Peña

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jorge Peña
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Human-Computer Interaction 441
  • Communication 205
  • Literature and Literary Theory 319
  • Social Psychology 421
  • Applied Psychology 98
Replace Paul Skalski with:
Paul Skalski United States
Sabrina C. Eimler Germany
John L. Sherry United States
Ed S. Tan Netherlands
Allison Eden United States
Bradley M. Okdie United States
Matthew Grizzard United States
Saraswathi Bellur United States
Anthony M. Limperos United States
Rick W. Busselle United States
Jorge Peña relative to Paul Skalski United States Paul Skalski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Paul Skalski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jorge Peña

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jorge Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jorge Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jorge Peña more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jorge Peña

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jorge Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jorge Peña. The network helps show where Jorge Peña may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jorge Peña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jorge Peña Line = papers co-authored together Jorge Peña links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20240
4 20241
5 20228
6 202114
7 20213
8 202130
9 20205
10 20184
11 20144
12 20134
13 201224
14 201057
15 201096
16 201031
17 2009210
18 20064
19 200664
20 2005115

About Jorge Peña

Jorge Peña is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Literature and Literary Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (18 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers), Digital Communication and Language (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (441 citations), Communication (205 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (319 citations), Social Psychology (421 citations) and Applied Psychology (98 citations). Jorge Peña has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and China. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey T. Hancock, Borae Jin, Nicholas Brody, Jhih-Syuan Lin, Eunice Kim, Brittany L. Peterson, Cassandra Alexopoulos, Kate Blackburn, Meng Chen and Minette E. Drumwright. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Communication Research, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, New Media & Society and Health Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026