Allison Eden

71 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Defining Media Enjoyment as the Satisfaction of Intrinsic Needs 2010 · 440 citations
4402010202620152020100200300400

Peers

Allison Eden
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Literature and Literary Theory 856
  • Applied Psychology 266
  • Human-Computer Interaction 200
  • Gender Studies 303
  • Social Psychology 546
Replace Marina Krcmar with:
Marina Krcmar United States
Paul D. Bolls United States
Ute Ritterfeld Germany
Holger Schramm Germany
Ron Tamborini United States
John L. Sherry United States
Jeroen Jansz Netherlands
James Ivory United States
Angeline Khoo Singapore
Muniba Saleem United States
Allison Eden relative to Marina Krcmar United States Marina Krcmar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Marina Krcmar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Allison Eden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Eden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Eden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Eden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Eden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Eden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Eden. The network helps show where Allison Eden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Allison Eden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Allison Eden Line = papers co-authored together Allison Eden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20241
4 20242
5 20241
6 20240
7 20221
8 20226
9 20223
10 20213
11 20216
12 202029
13 202017
14 2020125
15 201911
16 201714
17 201745
18 201634
19 201443
20 201326

About Allison Eden

Allison Eden is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Applied Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (45 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (17 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (856 citations), Applied Psychology (266 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (200 citations), Gender Studies (303 citations) and Social Psychology (546 citations). Allison Eden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ron Tamborini, Matthew Grizzard, Nicholas David Bowman, Leonard Reinecke, Robert Lewis, Christian Burgers, Tilo Hartmann, Benjamin K. Johnson, René Weber and Serena Daalmans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication, Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications, Media Psychology, Mass Communication & Society and Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026