Jonathan Parke

60 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jonathan Parke
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 93
  • Human-Computer Interaction 7
  • Marketing 9
Replace Keis Ohtsuka with:
Keis Ohtsuka Australia
Anna Z. Czarna Poland
Katalin Nagygyörgy Hungary
Ashley Bell Jones United States
Maria C. Haagsma Netherlands
Chelsea E. Sleep United States
David C. Vaidis France
Daniel Tornaim Spritzer Brazil
Jory Deleuze Belgium
José Luis Porrata Puerto Rico
Jonathan Parke relative to Keis Ohtsuka Australia Keis Ohtsuka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Keis Ohtsuka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Parke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Parke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Parke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Parke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Parke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Parke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Parke. The network helps show where Jonathan Parke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Parke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Parke Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Parke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002161
2 2007137
3 2009134
4 2006118
5
Adolescent gambling on the internet: a review.
2011117
6 200994
7 201286
8 201369
9 201558
10 201253
11 201952
12 200537
13 201336
14 202136
15
Exploring social gambling: scoping, classification and evidence review
201235
16 200224
17 201523
18 201221
19
Cashless and card-based technologies in gambling:A review of the literature
200820
20
Dissociative states in problem gambling
200619

About Jonathan Parke

Jonathan Parke is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Information Systems, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal and Infectious Diseases, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (57 papers) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (93 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (7 citations) and Marketing (9 citations). Jonathan Parke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark Damian Griffiths, Richard T. A. Wood, Adrian Parke, Sally Gainsbury, Niko Suhonen, Andrew Harris, Robert Wood, Paul Delfabbro, Chris Percy and Alex P. Blaszczynski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gambling Studies, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, International Gambling Studies, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Royal Society Open Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact