James Close

854 citations
26 papers · 500 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Close

24 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

James Close
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 20
  • Clinical Psychology 223
  • General Decision Sciences 7
  • Applied Psychology 14
  • Marketing 22
Replace Jan McMillen with:
Jan McMillen Australia
Davis Ka-Chio Fong Macao
Phillip Donaldson Australia
Dylan Pickering Australia
Ingeborg Lund Norway
Michael Dieter Egerer Finland
Helen Suurvali Canada
Emily Deans Australia
Ahmed Husain Ebrahim Bahrain
Katherine Robaina United States
James Close relative to Jan McMillen Australia Jan McMillen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×22.8×
Jan McMillen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Close

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Close's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Close with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Close more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Close

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Close. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Close. The network helps show where James Close may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Close, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Close Line = papers co-authored together James Close links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202184
2 202154
3 202245
4 201841
5 202136
6 201833
7 201828
8 201826
9 202221
10 201717
11 202516
12 202214
13 202313
14 202111
15 202111
16 20199
17 20219
18 20227
19 20186
20 20235

About James Close

James Close is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (11 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (20 citations), Clinical Psychology (223 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Marketing (22 citations). James Close has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Helen Mary Lloyd, Stuart Gordon Spicer, Laura Louise Nicklin, Joanne Lloyd, Maria Uther, Jane Horrell, Richard Byng, Hannah C. Wheat, José M Valderas and Thavapriya Sugavanam. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Health Expectations, Royal Society Open Science, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact