Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2020502 citationsMatthew Stevens, Paul Delfabbro et al.Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatryprofile →
Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic
2020468 citationsDaniel L. King, Paul Delfabbro et al.profile →
The cognitive psychology of Internet gaming disorder
2014258 citationsDaniel L. King, Paul Delfabbroprofile →
Family factors in adolescent problematic Internet gaming: A systematic review
2017243 citationsDaniel L. King, Paul Delfabbro et al.profile →
COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Delfabbro
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Delfabbro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Delfabbro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Delfabbro more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Delfabbro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Delfabbro. The network helps show where Paul Delfabbro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Delfabbro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Delfabbro.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Delfabbro based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Delfabbro. Paul Delfabbro is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Griffiths, Mark D., Daniel L. King, & Paul Delfabbro. (2012). Simulated gambling in video gaming: what are the implications for adolescents?. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 30(3). 68–70.13 indexed citations
15.
Blaszczynski, Alex, et al.. (2010). The psychology of gambling: [Prepared by members of the APS Gambling Working Group in collaboration with Jill Giese, APS Executive Officer.]. 32(6). 11.1 indexed citations
16.
Delfabbro, Paul, et al.. (2009). Foster Carers' Perceptions of the Effects of Parental Contact upon Children's Psychosocial Wellbeing in Long-term Foster Care. 4(2). 18.6 indexed citations
17.
King, Daniel L. & Paul Delfabbro. (2009). The general health status of heavy video game players: comparisons with Australian normative data. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 2(1). 17–26.5 indexed citations
18.
Delfabbro, Paul, et al.. (2008). Children with high support needs in Australian out-of-home care: A national comparative study. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).1 indexed citations
19.
Riggs, Damien W., Martha Augoustinos, & Paul Delfabbro. (2007). 'Basically It's a Recognition Issue': Validating Foster Parent Identities. Family matters. 57(76). 64–21.15 indexed citations
20.
Delfabbro, Paul, et al.. (2006). An analysis of the social background and placement history of children with multiple and complex needs in Australian out-of-home care. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.