International Gambling Studies

592 papers and 10.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 592 papers published in International Gambling Studies in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations. Papers published in International Gambling Studies usually cover Clinical Psychology (559 papers), Economics and Econometrics (112 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (96 papers) specifically the topics of Gambling Behavior and Treatments (557 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (190 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Gambling Studies are Sally Gainsbury, Alex Blaszczynski, Per Binde, Rachel A. Volberg, Paul Delfabbro, Nerilee Hing, David C. Hodgins, Mark D. Griffiths, Daniel L. King and Jim Orford.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Gambling Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Gambling Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Gambling Studies.

Countries where authors publish in International Gambling Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Gambling Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Gambling Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Gambling Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025