Jonathan Ives
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Ethics in medical practice 28
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Emergency Medical Services top 1%
- Disaster Response and Management 7
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 18
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 15
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 11
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 11
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 10
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 7
- Co-authors
- Heather DraperGeorgina MorleyCaroline Bradbury‐JonesFiona IrvineSarah DameryMichael DunnSue WilsonSheila Greenfield
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Ives
93 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- General Health Professions 1.1k
- Health Informatics 55
- Emergency Medical Services 231
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 933
- Clinical Psychology 483
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ives
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ives's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ives
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ives. The network helps show where Jonathan Ives may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Ives, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 132 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 20 | An Empirical Approach to Bioethics: Social Science 'Of', 'For' and 'In' Bioethics Research* | 2007 | 8 |
About Jonathan Ives
Jonathan Ives is a scholar working on Health Informatics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (28 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (18 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (11 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Disaster Response and Management (7 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Health Informatics (55 citations), Emergency Medical Services (231 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (933 citations) and Clinical Psychology (483 citations). Jonathan Ives has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heather Draper, Georgina Morley, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones, Fiona Irvine, Sarah Damery, Michael Dunn, Sue Wilson, Sheila Greenfield, Tom Sorell and Judith Petts. Their work appears in journals such as Bioethics, PLoS ONE, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMC Medical Ethics and Clinical Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.