Bioethics

1.9k papers and 24.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Bioethics in the last decades have received a total of 24.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Bioethics usually cover General Health Professions (877 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (754 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (399 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (741 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (359 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (270 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bioethics are Julian Savulescu, John Harris, Samia Hurst, Mark R. Wicclair, Nick Bostrom, Lori d’Agincourt-Canning, Heather Draper, Carina Fourie, Michael J. Selgelid and Paul M. McNeill.

In The Last Decade

Bioethics

1.7k papers receiving 21.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Bioethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bioethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bioethics.

Countries where authors publish in Bioethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bioethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bioethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioethics more than expected).

HUMAN NATURE AND ENHANCEMENT 2008 2026 2014 2020 43
  1. HUMAN NATURE AND ENHANCEMENT (2008)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026