Jan Schildmann

3.1k citations
163 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 24

Jan Schildmann

145 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Jan Schildmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
  • General Health Professions 986
  • Pharmacy 113
  • Family Practice 50
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 117
Replace Daniel Tawfik with:
Daniel Tawfik United States
Alan Meisel United States
Malcolm Parker Australia
Stella Reiter-Theil Switzerland
Davene R. Wright United States
Estela A. Beale United States
Atsushi Asai Japan
Simon Etkind United Kingdom
Tanja Krones Switzerland
Saleem Razack Canada
Jan Schildmann relative to Daniel Tawfik United States Daniel Tawfik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×53.5×
Daniel Tawfik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schildmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schildmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schildmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schildmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schildmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schildmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schildmann. The network helps show where Jan Schildmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Schildmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Schildmann Line = papers co-authored together Jan Schildmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20255
4 20241
5 20241
6 20240
7 20240
8 20240
9 20240
10 20230
11 20238
12 20222
13 201859
14 20172
15 20158
16 201492
17 201119
18
Empirische Medizinethik : Konzepte, Methoden und Ergebnisse
201112
19 20041
20
Sterbehilfe@@@Aid in dying
20043

About Jan Schildmann

Jan Schildmann is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Informatics, Pharmacy and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 163 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (75 papers), Ethics in medical practice (65 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (38 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (27 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (16 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (13 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (986 citations), Pharmacy (113 citations), Family Practice (50 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (117 citations). Jan Schildmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Vollmann, Eva Schildmann, Sabine Salloch, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Claudia Bausewein, Nicole Burchardi, Marjolein Gysels, Flavio D’Abramo, Bert Molewijk and John‐Stewart Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMC Medical Ethics, The Oncologist and Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026