Jan Schildmann

3.1k total citations
163 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Jan Schildmann is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Schildmann has authored 163 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 104 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 100 papers in General Health Professions and 23 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jan Schildmann's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (75 papers), Ethics in medical practice (65 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (38 papers). Jan Schildmann is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (75 papers), Ethics in medical practice (65 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (38 papers). Jan Schildmann collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Jan Schildmann's co-authors include Jochen Vollmann, Eva Schildmann, Sabine Salloch, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Claudia Bausewein, Nicole Burchardi, Marjolein Gysels, Flavio D’Abramo, Bert Molewijk and John‐Stewart Gordon and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Jan Schildmann

145 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jan Schildmann Germany 24 1.2k 986 281 270 136 163 1.8k
Anita J. Tarzian United States 21 642 0.5× 711 0.7× 296 1.1× 154 0.6× 93 0.7× 59 1.4k
Barbara A Daveson United Kingdom 33 1.9k 1.6× 936 0.9× 626 2.2× 493 1.8× 164 1.2× 100 2.7k
Alan Meisel United States 23 1.5k 1.3× 1.5k 1.5× 515 1.8× 1.0k 3.7× 141 1.0× 70 2.9k
Davene R. Wright United States 19 349 0.3× 328 0.3× 380 1.4× 355 1.3× 118 0.9× 70 1.6k
Stella Reiter-Theil Switzerland 23 1.1k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 351 1.2× 362 1.3× 39 0.3× 121 1.7k
Simon Etkind United Kingdom 17 1.5k 1.3× 852 0.9× 285 1.0× 570 2.1× 97 0.7× 41 2.3k
Atsushi Asai Japan 18 646 0.6× 508 0.5× 111 0.4× 163 0.6× 54 0.4× 79 1.1k
Carrie Jo Braden United States 20 267 0.2× 488 0.5× 390 1.4× 255 0.9× 118 0.9× 35 1.7k
Malcolm Parker Australia 19 923 0.8× 582 0.6× 186 0.7× 207 0.8× 64 0.5× 105 1.3k
Kelly Fryer‐Edwards United States 23 1.6k 1.4× 1.1k 1.1× 342 1.2× 196 0.7× 331 2.4× 29 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schildmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schildmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schildmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schildmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schildmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schildmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schildmann. The network helps show where Jan Schildmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Schildmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Schildmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Schildmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Schildmann. Jan Schildmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marckmann, Georg, et al.. (2025). Ethikberatung bei Anfragen nach Assistenz bei der Selbsttötung. Ethik in der Medizin. 37(4). 621–638.
3.
Schildmann, Jan, et al.. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care – Patients' Perceptions on Caregiving Relationships and Ethics: A Qualitative Study. Health Expectations. 28(2). e70216–e70216. 5 indexed citations
4.
Schildmann, Jan, et al.. (2024). Ethical conflicts in patient care situations of community pharmacists: a cross-sectional online survey. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 46(6). 1500–1513. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bausewein, Claudia, Carsten Klein, Christoph Ostgathe, et al.. (2024). Terminological Confusion About Sedation in Palliative Care: Results of an International Online Vignette Survey. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 27(4). 487–494. 1 indexed citations
6.
Frese, Thomas, Eva Johanna Kantelhardt, Rafael Mikolajczyk, et al.. (2024). User profiles in digitalized healthcare: active, potential, and rejecting — a cross-sectional study using latent class analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 24(1). 1083–1083.
7.
Christoph, Jan, et al.. (2024). Physicians’ Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence: Results of the PEAK Project. Studies in health technology and informatics. 316. 664–665.
8.
Schildmann, Jan, et al.. (2024). Patient:innenpartizipation in der klinisch-ethischen Forschung. 30(11). 1028–1034.
9.
Schneider, Manuela, Maria Heckel, Carsten Klein, et al.. (2024). Development of a Complex Intervention to Support the Use of Sedative Drugs in Specialist Palliative Care (iSedPall). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 527–536.
11.
Schoffer, Olaf, Patrick Jahn, Patrick Michl, et al.. (2023). Mental burden and moral distress among oncologists and oncology nurses in Germany during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 149(9). 6211–6223. 8 indexed citations
12.
Reis, Daniela, et al.. (2022). Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Pediatric Oncology – Development and Evaluation of a Blended Learning Program. Klinische Pädiatrie. 234(3). 163–168. 2 indexed citations
13.
Ives, Jonathan, Michael Dunn, Bert Molewijk, et al.. (2018). Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC Medical Ethics. 19(1). 68–68. 59 indexed citations
14.
Mehlis, Katja, et al.. (2017). The Role of Physicians in Rationing Cancer Care. Attitudes of German Oncologists. Oncology Research and Treatment. 40(9). 490–494. 2 indexed citations
15.
Schildmann, Jan, et al.. (2015). Decisions about Limiting Treatment in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Clinical Ethical Analysis of Reported Variables. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 18(10). 884–892. 8 indexed citations
16.
Schildmann, Eva & Jan Schildmann. (2014). Palliative Sedation Therapy: A Systematic Literature Review and Critical Appraisal of Available Guidance on Indication and Decision Making. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 17(5). 601–611. 92 indexed citations
17.
Weber, M., Julia Braun, & Jan Schildmann. (2011). Effects of a Ninety-Minute Teaching Module for Fourth-Year Medical Students on a Palliative Care Ward with Student–Patient Encounter. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 14(8). 940–944. 19 indexed citations
18.
Vollmann, Jochen & Jan Schildmann. (2011). Empirische Medizinethik : Konzepte, Methoden und Ergebnisse. Lit eBooks. 12 indexed citations
19.
Doyal, Lesley, et al.. (2004). CORRECTION. Journal of Medical Ethics. 30(6). 612.2–612. 1 indexed citations
20.
Schildmann, Jan, et al.. (2004). Sterbehilfe@@@Aid in dying. Ethik in der Medizin. 16(2). 123–132. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026