Mark Sheehan

2.6k total citations
89 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Mark Sheehan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Sheehan has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in General Health Professions, 32 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Sheehan's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (26 papers), Ethics in medical practice (22 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (13 papers). Mark Sheehan is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (26 papers), Ethics in medical practice (22 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (13 papers). Mark Sheehan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Mark Sheehan's co-authors include Michael Dunn, Phoebe Friesen, Michael Parker, Leah Z. Rand, Richard Griffith, Kerenza Hood, Victoria Shepherd, Fiona Wood, Tony Hope and Ilina Singh and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMJ and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Mark Sheehan

81 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Sheehan United Kingdom 22 549 533 176 137 120 89 1.2k
Michael Dunn United Kingdom 21 401 0.7× 498 0.9× 164 0.9× 276 2.0× 255 2.1× 85 1.5k
Darren Shickle United Kingdom 21 447 0.8× 413 0.8× 109 0.6× 168 1.2× 106 0.9× 66 1.5k
Rosamond Rhodes United States 21 612 1.1× 606 1.1× 118 0.7× 132 1.0× 102 0.8× 104 1.3k
Emily E. Anderson United States 21 586 1.1× 439 0.8× 144 0.8× 48 0.4× 158 1.3× 90 1.3k
Niklas Juth Sweden 19 468 0.9× 478 0.9× 70 0.4× 88 0.6× 257 2.1× 107 1.2k
Mara Buchbinder United States 22 485 0.9× 462 0.9× 258 1.5× 101 0.7× 268 2.2× 79 1.5k
Donna Dickenson United Kingdom 22 473 0.9× 355 0.7× 161 0.9× 266 1.9× 230 1.9× 83 1.4k
Lauren M. Hamel United States 20 627 1.1× 554 1.0× 514 2.9× 156 1.1× 149 1.2× 58 1.9k
Christian Simon United States 24 759 1.4× 617 1.2× 211 1.2× 178 1.3× 139 1.2× 66 1.4k
Alastair V. Campbell Singapore 17 491 0.9× 395 0.7× 110 0.6× 130 0.9× 103 0.9× 100 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sheehan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sheehan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sheehan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sheehan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sheehan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sheehan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sheehan. The network helps show where Mark Sheehan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Sheehan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Sheehan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Sheehan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Sheehan. Mark Sheehan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wijesurendra, Rohan S., et al.. (2024). Towards an understanding of the ethics of electronic consent in clinical trials. Trials. 25(1). 545–545.
2.
Dunn, Michael & Mark Sheehan. (2023). The myth of translational bioethics. Bioethics. 38(3). 196–203.
3.
Sheehan, Mark, et al.. (2020). Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). e26–e26. 27 indexed citations
4.
Shepherd, Victoria, Mark Sheehan, Kerenza Hood, Richard Griffith, & Fiona Wood. (2020). Constructing authentic decisions: proxy decision making for research involving adults who lack capacity to consent. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). e42–e42. 11 indexed citations
5.
Newdick, Christopher, Mark Sheehan, & Michael Dunn. (2020). Tragic choices in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: on fairness, consistency and community. Journal of Medical Ethics. 46(10). 646–651. 15 indexed citations
6.
Dunn, Michael, et al.. (2020). ‘Your country needs you’: the ethics of allocating staff to high-risk clinical roles in the management of patients with COVID-19. Journal of Medical Ethics. 46(7). 436–440. 48 indexed citations
7.
Rand, Leah Z., et al.. (2020). The ethics of grandfather clauses in healthcare resource allocation. Bioethics. 35(2). 151–160. 4 indexed citations
8.
McCoy, Matthew S., et al.. (2019). Patient and public involvement: Two sides of the same coin or different coins altogether?. Bioethics. 33(6). 708–715. 32 indexed citations
9.
Sheehan, Mark, Rachel Thompson, Jim Davies, et al.. (2019). Authority and the Future of Consent in Population-Level Biomedical Research. Public Health Ethics. 12(3). 225–236. 23 indexed citations
10.
Rand, Leah Z., Michael Dunn, Ingrid Slade, Sheela Upadhyaya, & Mark Sheehan. (2019). Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 17(1). 20–20. 54 indexed citations
11.
Friesen, Phoebe, et al.. (2019). Measuring the impact of participatory research in psychiatry: How the search for epistemic justifications obscures ethical considerations. Health Expectations. 24(S1). 54–61. 40 indexed citations
12.
McCoy, Matthew S., Karin Jongsma, Phoebe Friesen, et al.. (2018). National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees. Journal of Medical Ethics. 44(12). 801–804. 26 indexed citations
13.
Ives, Jonathan, Michael Dunn, Bert Molewijk, et al.. (2018). Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC Medical Ethics. 19(1). 68–68. 59 indexed citations
14.
Sheehan, Mark, et al.. (2017). In defence of governance: ethics review and social research. Journal of Medical Ethics. 44(10). 710–716. 9 indexed citations
15.
Sheehan, Mark. (2013). 'History as Something to Do, Not Just Something to Learn': Historical Thinking, Internal Assessment and Critical Citizenship. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. 48(2). 69. 7 indexed citations
16.
Sheehan, Mark. (2013). Do we need research ethics committees?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 39(8). 485–485. 4 indexed citations
17.
Sheehan, Mark. (2011). 'Historical significance' in the senior school curriculum. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. 46(2). 35. 2 indexed citations
18.
Sheehan, Mark. (2011). Public relations : theories, practices, critiques : Jim Macnamara, Pearson 2012. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 12(2). 79–80. 8 indexed citations
19.
Sheehan, Mark. (2011). It's unethical for general practitioners to be commissioners. BMJ. 342(mar09 3). d1430–d1430. 3 indexed citations
20.
Sheehan, Mark. (2006). McDonalds in Crisis: A Comparative Analysis in a National Organizational Context. Competition Forum. 4(1). 221. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026