Daniel Strech

4.3k total citations
143 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Daniel Strech is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Strech has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 100 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 78 papers in General Health Professions and 44 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Daniel Strech's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (72 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (42 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (30 papers). Daniel Strech is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (72 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (42 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (30 papers). Daniel Strech collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Daniel Strech's co-authors include Neema Sofaer, Georg Marckmann, Hannes Kahrass, Marcel Mertz, Matthis Synofzik, Sabine Bossert, Susanne Wieschowski, Verina Wild, Ulrich Dirnagl and Marion Danis and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Strech

137 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Strech Germany 27 1.1k 1.1k 528 292 284 143 2.5k
Elizabeth Wager United Kingdom 31 712 0.6× 1.4k 1.2× 506 1.0× 258 0.9× 1.3k 4.6× 106 4.3k
Barbara Mintzes Australia 28 633 0.6× 840 0.8× 1.2k 2.2× 176 0.6× 273 1.0× 122 3.7k
Kevin McGeechan Australia 37 1.4k 1.2× 1.2k 1.0× 270 0.5× 354 1.2× 56 0.2× 166 4.5k
Tony Tse United States 28 546 0.5× 1.2k 1.1× 886 1.7× 197 0.7× 1.1k 4.0× 56 3.2k
Charles Weijer Canada 37 1.9k 1.7× 2.7k 2.5× 1.0k 1.9× 844 2.9× 461 1.6× 225 5.1k
Deborah A. Zarin United States 35 715 0.6× 1.6k 1.5× 1.2k 2.4× 242 0.8× 1.4k 4.8× 97 4.8k
Jason W. Beckstead United States 30 507 0.4× 354 0.3× 145 0.3× 213 0.7× 39 0.1× 127 2.7k
Peter Lurie United States 29 719 0.6× 1.2k 1.1× 434 0.8× 477 1.6× 44 0.2× 117 3.1k
Daniel Kotz Netherlands 35 964 0.9× 1.1k 1.0× 139 0.3× 2.5k 8.5× 128 0.5× 159 4.3k
Bjørn Hofmann Norway 34 1.7k 1.5× 1.0k 0.9× 859 1.6× 405 1.4× 59 0.2× 258 4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Strech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Strech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Strech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Strech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Strech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Strech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Strech. The network helps show where Daniel Strech may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Strech

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Strech. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Strech based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Strech. Daniel Strech is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zenker, Sven, Daniel Strech, Roland Jahns, et al.. (2024). National standardisierter Broad Consent in der Praxis: erste Erfahrungen, aktuelle Entwicklungen und kritische Betrachtungen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 67(6). 637–647. 5 indexed citations
2.
Schorr, Susanne Gabriele, et al.. (2024). Informed consent and trial prioritization for clinical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stakeholder experiences and viewpoints. PLoS ONE. 19(4). e0302755–e0302755. 1 indexed citations
3.
Strech, Daniel, et al.. (2023). Reporting of retrospective registration in clinical trial publications: a cross-sectional study of German trials. BMJ Open. 13(4). e069553–e069553. 8 indexed citations
4.
5.
Carlisle, Benjamin Gregory, et al.. (2023). Institutional dashboards on clinical trial transparency for University Medical Centers: A case study. PLoS Medicine. 20(3). e1004175–e1004175. 3 indexed citations
6.
Schorr, Susanne Gabriele, et al.. (2022). Preclinical efficacy in investigator's brochures: Stakeholders' views on measures to improve completeness and robustness. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 89(1). 340–350. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hoffmann, Dirk, et al.. (2022). Risk assessment in gene therapy and somatic genome-editing: An expert interview study. 3-4. 100011–100011. 3 indexed citations
8.
Wieschowski, Susanne, et al.. (2022). Measurement challenges and causes of incomplete results reporting of biomedical animal studies: Results from an interview study. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0271976–e0271976. 4 indexed citations
9.
Salholz‐Hillel, Maia, Daniel Strech, & Benjamin Gregory Carlisle. (2022). Results publications are inadequately linked to trial registrations: An automated pipeline and evaluation of German university medical centers. Clinical Trials. 19(3). 337–346. 3 indexed citations
10.
Heinl, Céline, David Thomas Mellor, Gilbert Schönfelder, et al.. (2022). Declaration of common standards for the preregistration of animal research—speeding up the scientific progress. PNAS Nexus. 1(1). pgac016–pgac016. 10 indexed citations
11.
Riedel, Nico, et al.. (2020). Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open. 10(1). e034666–e034666. 9 indexed citations
12.
Wieschowski, Susanne, et al.. (2020). Investigator brochures for phase I/II trials lack information on the robustness of preclinical safety studies. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 87(7). 2723–2731. 3 indexed citations
13.
Strech, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative. PLoS Biology. 18(2). e3000576–e3000576. 19 indexed citations
14.
Wieschowski, Susanne, Nico Riedel, Hannes Kahrass, et al.. (2019). Result dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centers was delayed and incomplete. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 115. 37–45. 29 indexed citations
15.
Toelch, Ulf, Ahmed A. Khalil, Ulrich Dirnagl, et al.. (2019). 2019 - Improving [Your] Science Course - Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints).
16.
17.
Strech, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Governance of data sharing. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 2 indexed citations
18.
McLennan, Stuart, et al.. (2017). Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 19(8). e299–e299. 15 indexed citations
19.
Chin, William W., Susanne Wieschowski, Jana Prokein, Thomas Illig, & Daniel Strech. (2016). Ethics Reporting in Biospecimen and Genetic Research: Current Practice and Suggestions for Changes. PLoS Biology. 14(8). e1002521–e1002521. 1 indexed citations
20.
Strech, Daniel, et al.. (2013). Ethics in public health and health policy : concepts, methods, case studies. Springer eBooks. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth Wager Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barbara Mintzes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kevin McGeechan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tony Tse Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles Weijer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah A. Zarin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason W. Beckstead Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter Lurie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Kotz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bjørn Hofmann
Rankless by CCL
2026