John Stone

1.5k total citations
111 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

John Stone is a scholar working on Transportation, Building and Construction and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John Stone has authored 111 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Transportation, 29 papers in Building and Construction and 21 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in John Stone's work include Urban Transport and Accessibility (34 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (30 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (21 papers). John Stone is often cited by papers focused on Urban Transport and Accessibility (34 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (30 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (21 papers). John Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. John Stone's co-authors include Paul Mees, Crystal Legacy, Carey Curtis, David Ashmore, John W. Baugh, Jan Scheurer, Jin Ki Eom, Sujit K. Ghosh, Harold M. Koenig and Jago Dodson and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, CHEST Journal and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

John Stone

101 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Stone United States 17 452 303 179 97 95 111 1.0k
Stephen Mattingly United States 13 288 0.6× 147 0.5× 127 0.7× 78 0.8× 82 0.9× 113 877
A E Pisarski United States 10 379 0.8× 217 0.7× 133 0.7× 16 0.2× 73 0.8× 40 817
Andrew Evans United Kingdom 22 526 1.2× 125 0.4× 159 0.9× 19 0.2× 52 0.5× 59 1.4k
José António Sarsfield Cabral Portugal 16 770 1.7× 262 0.9× 121 0.7× 21 0.2× 77 0.8× 47 1.5k
Darío Hidalgo United States 19 929 2.1× 287 0.9× 263 1.5× 20 0.2× 53 0.6× 69 1.2k
Nancy McGuckin United States 12 781 1.7× 404 1.3× 182 1.0× 29 0.3× 109 1.1× 25 1.1k
Stephen Greaves Australia 24 1.4k 3.0× 606 2.0× 306 1.7× 43 0.4× 129 1.4× 118 2.3k
Eric Kroes Netherlands 11 606 1.3× 202 0.7× 147 0.8× 39 0.4× 61 0.6× 41 930
Piyushimita Thakuriah United States 19 1.1k 2.4× 279 0.9× 326 1.8× 23 0.2× 150 1.6× 91 1.4k
Gabriela Beirão Portugal 8 767 1.7× 246 0.8× 118 0.7× 61 0.6× 161 1.7× 10 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stone. The network helps show where John Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Stone. John Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mees, Paul, Patrick Moriarty, John Stone, & Michael Buxton. (2024). Putting the public interest back into public transport: a report to the Victorian community. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).
2.
Stone, John. (2017). Cultivating Humility and Diagnostic Openness in Clinical Judgment. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 19(10). 970–977. 7 indexed citations
3.
Haddad, Amy, et al.. (2016). Teaching and Learning Health Justice: Best Practices and Recommendations for Innovation.. International journal on teaching and learning in higher education. 28(3). 440–450. 2 indexed citations
4.
Stone, John, et al.. (2015). Grade separations and intermodal transfer at railway stations in Melbourne. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
5.
Lawrie, Iain & John Stone. (2015). Missing the Connection? A case study approach to understanding effective public transit transfers in dispersed lower density cities. Transport Research Forum. 2 indexed citations
6.
Stone, John, et al.. (2015). Grade separations and improving intermodal transfer at railway stations in Melbourne. Transport Research Forum. 2 indexed citations
7.
Stone, John, et al.. (2015). The spatial distribution of the travel to work by sustainable transport modes in Australian cities from 2001 to 2011. Transport Research Forum. 1 indexed citations
8.
Burke, Terry & John Stone. (2014). Transport disadvantage and low-income rental housing. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 157(157). 1–62. 4 indexed citations
9.
Stone, John. (2013). Planning for affordable transit infrastructure and service expansion: two European case studies. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
10.
Stone, John. (2010). Turning over a new franchise: Assessing the current health of public transport management in Melbourne. Transport Research Forum. 1 indexed citations
11.
Stone, John, et al.. (2010). NCDOT Quality Control Methods for Weigh in Motion Data. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. 1 indexed citations
12.
Stone, John, et al.. (2010). An investigation of institutional arrangements for design and delivery of multimodal public transport in Melbourne. Transport Research Forum. 4 indexed citations
13.
Stone, John. (2009). The role of planners in contention over transport policy: Contrasting behaviour and outcomes in Melbourne and Vancouver since 1970. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 1 indexed citations
14.
Stone, John & Groesbeck P. Parham. (2007). An Ethical Framework for Community Health Workers and Related Institutions. Family & Community Health. 30(4). 351–363. 10 indexed citations
15.
Stone, John, et al.. (1994). COMPUTER DISPATCH AND SCHEDULING FOR PARATRANSIT: AN APPLICATION OF ADVANCED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. Transportation quarterly. 48(2). 9 indexed citations
16.
Stone, John, et al.. (1993). ASSESSMENT OF SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERIZED PARATRANSIT OPERATIONS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 12 indexed citations
17.
Powell, Jonathan D., John Stone, Wing C. Chan, et al.. (1989). Interferon-γ-treated K562 target cells distinguish functional NK cells from lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. Cellular Immunology. 118(2). 250–264. 15 indexed citations
18.
Stone, John, et al.. (1987). INTERSECTION ADVISOR: AN EXPERT SYSTEM FOR INTERSECTION DESIGN. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 8 indexed citations
19.
Lightsey, Alton L., Harold M. Koenig, Robert McMillan, & John Stone. (1979). Platelet-associated immunoglobulin G in childhood idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. The Journal of Pediatrics. 94(2). 201–204. 36 indexed citations
20.
Stone, John. (1953). The Sudan economy : introductory notes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026