Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of A E Pisarski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A E Pisarski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A E Pisarski more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A E Pisarski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A E Pisarski. The network helps show where A E Pisarski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A E Pisarski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A E Pisarski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A E Pisarski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A E Pisarski. A E Pisarski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pisarski, A E, et al.. (2012). Connecting Transportation Investment and the Economy in Metropolitan Washington.
3.
Pisarski, A E. (2010). In Search of Sustainability. ITE journal. 80(1).2 indexed citations
4.
Pisarski, A E. (2009). The Nexus of Energy, Environment and the Economy: A Win, Win, Win Opportunity. ITE journal. 79(1).2 indexed citations
5.
Pisarski, A E, et al.. (2009). Bottom Line Technical Report: Highway and Public Transportation National and State Investment Needs.1 indexed citations
6.
Stopher, Peter, Rahaf Alsnih, Chester G. Wilmot, et al.. (2008). Standardized Procedures for Personal Travel Surveys. National Cooperative Highway Research Program report.4 indexed citations
7.
Pisarski, A E. (2007). A Vision of Visualization: Communicating Problem-Solving Concepts to the Public. TR news.1 indexed citations
8.
Pisarski, A E, et al.. (2007). Rush Hour: How States Can Reduce Congestion Through Performance-Based Transportation Programs.1 indexed citations
9.
Pisarski, A E. (2006). New NCHRP-TCRP Report: Commuting in America III: The Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. TR news.10 indexed citations
10.
Pisarski, A E. (2005). Future Highway and Public Transportation Finance. Phase I: Current Outlook and Short-Term Solutions.3 indexed citations
11.
Pisarski, A E. (2003). PRESCRIPTIONS FOR RESEARCH: REVIEWING THE HISTORY OF TRB'S CRITICAL ISSUES IN TRANSPORTATION. TR news.9 indexed citations
12.
Pisarski, A E. (2003). SOME THOUGHTS ON THE CENSUS: TRANSIT STATISTICAL MATCH-UP. Transportation quarterly. 57(3).1 indexed citations
Pisarski, A E. (1997). CARPOOLING: PAST TRENDS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. Transportation quarterly. 51(2).3 indexed citations
16.
Pisarski, A E. (1992). NEW PERSPECTIVES IN COMMUTING.21 indexed citations
17.
Pisarski, A E. (1989). ISSUES IN TRANSPORTATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT. FROM THE BOOK UNDERSTANDING GROWTH MANAGEMENT: CRITICAL ISSUES AND A RESEARCH AGENDA.2 indexed citations
18.
Pisarski, A E. (1987). THE NATION'S PUBLIC WORKS: REPORT ON HIGHWAYS, STREETS, ROADS AND BRIDGES. A STUDY OF POLICY ISSUES IN HIGHWAYS, STREETS, AND BRIDGES.2 indexed citations
19.
Pisarski, A E. (1987). COMMUTING IN AMERICA: A NATIONAL REPORT ON COMMUTING PATTERNS AND TRENDS. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.