John Prescott

10.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
142 papers, 7.8k citations indexed

About

John Prescott is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Sensory Systems and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Prescott has authored 142 papers receiving a total of 7.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 71 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 68 papers in Sensory Systems and 57 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in John Prescott's work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (68 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (68 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (53 papers). John Prescott is often cited by papers focused on Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (68 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (68 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (53 papers). John Prescott collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and New Zealand. John Prescott's co-authors include Diane Bourn, Dana M. Small, Richard J. Stevenson, Robert A. Boakes, Erminio Monteleone, O.A. Young, Lynda O’Neill, Caterina Dinnella, Sara Spinelli and Graham Bell and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Clinical Cancer Research and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

John Prescott

140 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

A Comparison of the Nutritional Value, Sensory Qualities,... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Prescott Australia 49 3.4k 3.0k 2.9k 982 964 142 7.8k
Hely Tuorila Finland 48 2.8k 0.8× 5.0k 1.6× 1.6k 0.5× 710 0.7× 451 0.5× 159 8.1k
Herbert L. Meiselman United States 43 2.0k 0.6× 3.9k 1.3× 1.7k 0.6× 986 1.0× 383 0.4× 121 6.2k
Sylvie Issanchou France 46 2.1k 0.6× 3.1k 1.0× 1.3k 0.4× 513 0.5× 520 0.5× 151 6.6k
Cees de Graaf Netherlands 70 5.9k 1.7× 5.2k 1.7× 2.9k 1.0× 1.3k 1.3× 774 0.8× 341 16.2k
Harry T. Lawless United States 50 4.3k 1.3× 5.6k 1.8× 3.1k 1.1× 1.2k 1.2× 1.7k 1.8× 133 9.7k
Erminio Monteleone Italy 41 1.5k 0.5× 2.9k 1.0× 1.1k 0.4× 393 0.4× 293 0.3× 143 4.7k
Gary K. Beauchamp United States 69 7.7k 2.2× 1.9k 0.6× 6.3k 2.2× 661 0.7× 3.1k 3.2× 235 15.4k
Hildegarde Heymann United States 49 2.8k 0.8× 7.5k 2.5× 932 0.3× 494 0.5× 856 0.9× 185 10.1k
Wender L.P. Bredie Denmark 42 1.5k 0.4× 2.5k 0.8× 624 0.2× 329 0.3× 611 0.6× 157 5.0k
Linda M. Bartoshuk United States 58 7.0k 2.0× 2.6k 0.8× 6.1k 2.1× 865 0.9× 3.3k 3.4× 129 10.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John Prescott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Prescott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Prescott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Prescott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Prescott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Prescott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Prescott. The network helps show where John Prescott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Prescott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Prescott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Prescott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Prescott. John Prescott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spinelli, Sara, et al.. (2024). Distinct sensory hedonic functions for sourness in adults. Food Quality and Preference. 116. 105152–105152. 5 indexed citations
2.
Prescott, John & Sara Spinelli. (2024). Arousal and the modulation of sensory experience: evidence from food-related emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 379(1908). 20230255–20230255. 7 indexed citations
3.
Jaeger, Sara R., Duncan Hedderley, & John Prescott. (2023). High arousal as the source of food rejection in food neophobia. Food Research International. 168. 112795–112795. 13 indexed citations
4.
Spinelli, Sara, John Prescott, Lapo Pierguidi, et al.. (2021). Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns. Nutrients. 13(3). 866–866. 17 indexed citations
5.
Sinding, Charlotte, Thomas Hummel, Noëlle Béno, et al.. (2021). Configural memory of a blending aromatic mixture reflected in activation of the left orbital part of the inferior frontal gyrus. Behavioural Brain Research. 402. 113088–113088. 7 indexed citations
6.
Dermiki, Maria, et al.. (2015). Novel flavours paired with glutamate condition increased intake in older adults in the absence of changes in liking. Appetite. 90. 108–113. 20 indexed citations
7.
Masi, C, Caterina Dinnella, Erminio Monteleone, & John Prescott. (2014). The impact of individual variations in taste sensitivity on coffee perceptions and preferences. Physiology & Behavior. 138. 219–226. 86 indexed citations
8.
Wong, Harvey, Laurent Vernillet, Amy Peterson, et al.. (2012). Bridging the Gap between Preclinical and Clinical Studies Using Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Modeling: An Analysis of GDC-0973, a MEK Inhibitor. Clinical Cancer Research. 18(11). 3090–3099. 65 indexed citations
9.
Prescott, John, et al.. (2008). PROP Taster Status and the Rejection of Foods with Added Tastants. Food Science and Biotechnology. 17(5). 1066–1073. 23 indexed citations
10.
Yeomans, Martin R., et al.. (2007). Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy. Physiology & Behavior. 91(2-3). 264–273. 122 indexed citations
11.
Prescott, John, et al.. (2004). Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages. Physiology & Behavior. 82(2-3). 459–469. 97 indexed citations
12.
Girgis, Seham, et al.. (2003). A one-quarter reduction in the salt content of bread can be made without detection. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 57(4). 616–620. 194 indexed citations
13.
Prescott, John. (2003). Effects of added glutamate on liking for novel food flavors. Appetite. 42(2). 143–150. 80 indexed citations
14.
Prescott, John, et al.. (2002). Does information about MSG (monosodium glutamate) content influence consumer ratings of soups with and without added MSG?. Appetite. 39(1). 25–33. 49 indexed citations
15.
Prescott, John, et al.. (2001). Binary Taste Mixture Interactions in PROP Non-tasters, Medium-tasters and Super-tasters. Chemical Senses. 26(8). 993–1003. 80 indexed citations
16.
Stevenson, Richard J. & John Prescott. (1997). Judgments of chemosensory mixtures in memory. Acta Psychologica. 95(2). 195–214. 20 indexed citations
17.
Prescott, John & Richard J. Stevenson. (1996). Desensitization to Oral Zingerone Irritation: Effects of Stimulus Parameters. Physiology & Behavior. 60(6). 1473–1480. 26 indexed citations
18.
Prescott, John, et al.. (1993). Acute effects of kava on measures of cognitive performance, physiological function and mood. Drug and Alcohol Review. 12(1). 49–57. 23 indexed citations
19.
Telfer, Nancy, Lanny H. Cornell, & John Prescott. (1970). Do Dolphins Drink Water?. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 157(5). 555–558. 25 indexed citations
20.
Caldwell, David K.‏, John Prescott, & Melba C. Caldwell. (1966). Production of Pulsed Sounds by the Pigmy Sperm Whale, Kogia breviceps. Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences. 65(4). 245–248. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026