John Phillimore

940 citations
42 papers · 445 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John Phillimore

38 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

John Phillimore
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 78
  • Public Administration 38
  • Strategy and Management 121
  • Business and International Management 9
  • Political Science and International Relations 97
Replace Ken Dovey with:
Ken Dovey Australia
Edward Jackson Canada
Ting Ren China
Branka Krivokapic‐Skoko Australia
Bram Wauters Belgium
Petri Virtanen Finland
Ruth McKay Canada
Raffi Duymedjian France
Dean Bartlett United Kingdom
Heather R. Parola United States
John Phillimore relative to Ken Dovey Australia Ken Dovey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ken Dovey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Phillimore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Phillimore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Phillimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Phillimore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Phillimore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Phillimore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Phillimore. The network helps show where John Phillimore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Phillimore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Phillimore Line = papers co-authored together John Phillimore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999119
2 201835
3 200132
4 198924
5 201323
6 201721
7 201420
8 198916
9 201516
10 201714
11 202013
12 201911
13
Common Cause: strengthening Australia's cooperative federalism
20099
14 20139
15 20029
16 20178
17 20138
18 20006
19 19976
20 20145

About John Phillimore

John Phillimore is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Education and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 42 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (10 papers), Political Systems and Governance (7 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (5 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (78 citations), Public Administration (38 citations), Strategy and Management (121 citations), Business and International Management (9 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (97 citations). John Phillimore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Gilchrist, Alan Fenna, Paul Koshy, Tim Pitman, Lance Richard McMahon, John Wanna, Suzanne Robinson, Aidan Davison, Leanne Lester and Jonathan Leo. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Public Administration, Australian Journal of Politics & History, Technovation, Policy Studies and Futures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026