Tom Booth

8.3k total citations
138 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Tom Booth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Booth has authored 138 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Clinical Psychology, 24 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 22 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Tom Booth's work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (20 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (18 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (13 papers). Tom Booth is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (20 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (18 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (13 papers). Tom Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Tom Booth's co-authors include Aja Louise Murray, Ian J. Deary, Karen McKenzie, Paul Irwing, John M. Starr, Renate Kuenssberg, Mark E. Bastin, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Alan J. Gow and Marco Del Giudice and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Tom Booth

129 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Booth United Kingdom 30 701 598 486 404 348 138 3.1k
J.C. Gatenby United States 15 434 0.6× 1.6k 2.7× 345 0.7× 268 0.7× 50 0.1× 21 4.0k
K. Hirose Japan 14 308 0.4× 363 0.6× 285 0.6× 165 0.4× 171 0.5× 65 3.1k
Cees Jonker Netherlands 45 649 0.9× 1.5k 2.5× 913 1.9× 3.2k 7.9× 65 0.2× 118 6.8k
Hans Knutsson Sweden 31 292 0.4× 2.6k 4.4× 555 1.1× 403 1.0× 197 0.6× 239 6.7k
John L. Black United States 34 484 0.7× 361 0.6× 420 0.9× 419 1.0× 39 0.1× 154 3.8k
Manuel Desco Spain 48 372 0.5× 1.4k 2.4× 217 0.4× 1.1k 2.8× 34 0.1× 425 9.0k
John D. O’Sullivan Australia 37 376 0.5× 991 1.7× 178 0.4× 466 1.2× 199 0.6× 136 5.2k
Thomas V. Wiecki United States 16 211 0.3× 1.9k 3.2× 572 1.2× 244 0.6× 56 0.2× 26 4.2k
Geoffrey W. Stuart Australia 39 1.2k 1.8× 1.7k 2.9× 354 0.7× 1.4k 3.5× 71 0.2× 116 4.6k
Ralf Schulze Germany 18 371 0.5× 606 1.0× 808 1.7× 99 0.2× 63 0.2× 39 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Booth. The network helps show where Tom Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Booth. Tom Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Chamberlain, J. D., Daniel Ackermann, Murielle Bochud, et al.. (2025). Development and validation of an epigenetic signature of allostatic load. Bioscience Reports. 45(4). 247–262.
3.
Murray, Aja Louise, et al.. (2025). Mental health trajectories surrounding retirement: A longitudinal perspective. SSM - Mental Health. 8. 100470–100470.
4.
Booth, Tom, et al.. (2024). Personality‐sensitive pedagogies: A study of small group interactive behaviours among 9‐ to 10‐year‐olds. British Educational Research Journal. 50(6). 2875–2898.
5.
Bratko, Denis, Patrick Jern, Christian Kandler, et al.. (2024). Nuanced HEXACO: A Meta-Analysis of HEXACO Cross-Rater Agreement, Heritability, and Rank-Order Stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 51(12). 2425–2444. 4 indexed citations
6.
Booth, Tom, Dominika Dykiert, Janie Corley, et al.. (2019). Reaction time variability and brain white matter integrity.. Neuropsychology. 33(5). 642–657. 10 indexed citations
7.
Ballerini, Lucia, Tom Booth, María Valdés Hernández, et al.. (2019). Computational quantification of brain perivascular space morphologies: Associations with vascular risk factors and white matter hyperintensities. A study in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. NeuroImage Clinical. 25. 102120–102120. 45 indexed citations
8.
Murray, Aja Louise, Carrie Allison, Paula Smith, et al.. (2016). Investigating diagnostic bias in autism spectrum conditions: An item response theory analysis of sex bias in the AQ‐10. Autism Research. 10(5). 790–800. 32 indexed citations
9.
Booth, Tom, Mark E. Bastin, Lars Penke, et al.. (2013). Brain white matter tract integrity and cognitive abilities in community-dwelling older people: The Lothian Birth Cohort, 1936.. Neuropsychology. 27(5). 595–607. 28 indexed citations
10.
Booth, Tom. (2012). A review of the structure of normal range personality. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 2 indexed citations
11.
Booth, Tom, Ian J. Deary, & John M. Starr. (2012). Thyroid stimulating hormone, free thyroxine and cognitive ability in old age: The Lothian birth cohort study 1936. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 38(4). 597–601. 18 indexed citations
12.
Favorite, Jeffrey, et al.. (2011). On the Accuracy of a Common Monte Carlo Surface Flux Grazing Approximation. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 168(2). 115–127. 2 indexed citations
13.
Booth, Tom & J. E. Gubernatis. (2009). Improved criticality convergence via a modified Monte Carlo iteration method. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 5 indexed citations
14.
Sood, Avneet, et al.. (2009). A weighted adjoint-source for weight-window generation by means of a linear tally combination. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 12 indexed citations
15.
Booth, Tom. (1992). A caution on reliability using optimal variance reduction parameters. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 66. 2 indexed citations
16.
Pederson, Shane P., et al.. (1992). Two proposed convergence criteria for Monte Carlo solutions. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 66. 2 indexed citations
17.
Booth, Tom. (1991). Analytic comparison of Monte Carlo geometry splitting and exponential transform. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 63.
18.
Booth, Tom. (1989). Intelligent Monte Carlo phase-space division and importance estimation. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 60. 2 indexed citations
19.
Booth, Tom. (1985). Exponential convergence for Monte Carlo particle transport. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 50. 13 indexed citations
20.
Booth, Tom. (1982). Automatic importance estimation in forward Monte Carlo calculations. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 41. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026