Ruth Sibbett

431 total citations
9 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Ruth Sibbett is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Sibbett has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 2 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Ruth Sibbett's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). Ruth Sibbett is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). Ruth Sibbett collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Nigeria and Canada. Ruth Sibbett's co-authors include Ian J. Deary, John M. Starr, Tom C. Russ, Alison Pattie, Paul Redmond, Adele M. Taylor, Stuart J. Ritchie, Simon R. Cox, Janie Corley and Elliot M. Tucker–Drob and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Brain Mapping, Neurobiology of Aging and Psychology and Aging.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Sibbett

9 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ruth Sibbett United Kingdom	7	128	50	49	49	41	9	288
Dorota Chapko United Kingdom	5	98 0.8×	73 1.5×	32 0.7×	33 0.7×	31 0.8×	10	329
Indira C. Turney United States	11	86 0.7×	45 0.9×	95 1.9×	22 0.4×	36 0.9×	28	325
Anamaria Brăilean United Kingdom	11	139 1.1×	36 0.7×	68 1.4×	113 2.3×	28 0.7×	11	437
Kevin A. González United States	10	93 0.7×	93 1.9×	59 1.2×	39 0.8×	35 0.9×	35	276
Ryan J. Piers United States	11	124 1.0×	46 0.9×	72 1.5×	26 0.5×	23 0.6×	12	353
Sivaniya Subramaniapillai Canada	9	94 0.7×	39 0.8×	81 1.7×	15 0.3×	31 0.8×	19	284
Kimberly R. Chapman United States	11	166 1.3×	46 0.9×	71 1.4×	27 0.6×	16 0.4×	19	348
Ding Ding China	11	208 1.6×	124 2.5×	87 1.8×	21 0.4×	15 0.4×	21	344
Julie Kuo United States	7	149 1.2×	74 1.5×	39 0.8×	12 0.2×	16 0.4×	9	308
Ashita S. Gurnani United States	11	209 1.6×	89 1.8×	96 2.0×	30 0.6×	29 0.7×	22	337

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Sibbett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Sibbett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Sibbett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Sibbett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Sibbett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Sibbett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Sibbett. The network helps show where Ruth Sibbett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Sibbett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Sibbett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Sibbett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Sibbett. Ruth Sibbett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Sibbett, Ruth, Drew Altschul, Riccardo E. Marioni, et al.. (2020). DNA methylation-based measures of accelerated biological ageing and the risk of dementia in the oldest-old: a study of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 91–91. 28 indexed citations

Sibbett, Ruth, Tom C. Russ, Alison Pattie, John M. Starr, & Ian J. Deary. (2018). Does incipient dementia explain normal cognitive decline determinants? Lothian birth cohort 1921.. Psychology and Aging. 33(4). 674–684. 6 indexed citations

Sibbett, Ruth, Tom C. Russ, Mike Allerhand, Ian J. Deary, & John M. Starr. (2018). Physical fitness and dementia risk in the very old: a study of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. BMC Psychiatry. 18(1). 285–285. 18 indexed citations

Sibbett, Ruth, Tom C. Russ, Ian J. Deary, & John M. Starr. (2017). Risk factors for dementia in the ninth decade of life and beyond: a study of the Lothian birth cohort 1921. BMC Psychiatry. 17(1). 205–205. 18 indexed citations

Ritchie, Stuart J., David Alexander Dickie, Simon R. Cox, et al.. (2017). Brain structural differences between 73- and 92-year olds matched for childhood intelligence, social background, and intracranial volume. Neurobiology of Aging. 62. 146–158. 10 indexed citations

Sibbett, Ruth, Tom C. Russ, Ian J. Deary, & John M. Starr. (2017). Dementia ascertainment using existing data in UK longitudinal and cohort studies: a systematic review of methodology. BMC Psychiatry. 17(1). 239–239. 36 indexed citations

Ritchie, Stuart J., Elliot M. Tucker–Drob, Simon R. Cox, et al.. (2016). Predictors of ageing-related decline across multiple cognitive functions. Intelligence. 59. 115–126. 109 indexed citations

Ritchie, Stuart J., David Alexander Dickie, Simon R. Cox, et al.. (2015). Brain volumetric changes and cognitive ageing during the eighth decade of life. Human Brain Mapping. 36(12). 4910–4925. 59 indexed citations

Sibbett, Ruth, et al.. (2012). Recruitment in psychiatry: a complex and multifactorial problem. The Psychiatrist. 36(3). 118–119. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact