C. C. Booth

5.4k total citations
122 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

C. C. Booth is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. C. Booth has authored 122 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Gastroenterology, 25 papers in Surgery and 19 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in C. C. Booth's work include Celiac Disease Research and Management (18 papers), Digestive system and related health (15 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (10 papers). C. C. Booth is often cited by papers focused on Celiac Disease Research and Management (18 papers), Digestive system and related health (15 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (10 papers). C. C. Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. C. C. Booth's co-authors include D. L. Mollin, S. Tabaqchali, James S. Stewart, Gilbert R. Thompson, G Slavin, R. H. Dowling, A. G. E. Pearse, A. V. Hoffbrand, G. Neale and Adrian P. Douglas and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

In The Last Decade

C. C. Booth

117 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

C. C. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Surgery 1.3k
  • Gastroenterology 1.2k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 862
  • Epidemiology 746
  • Genetics 740
Replace R. Naccarato with:
R. Naccarato Italy
L. J. Witts United Kingdom
John B. Gross United States
S.G.M. Meuwissen Netherlands
Janet Marks United Kingdom
Stanley A. Cohen United States
Federico Biagi Italy
Peter H.R. Green United States
Paul Smethurst United Kingdom
John W. Singleton United States
R. Naccarato Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to C. C. Booth
C. C. Booth · 1×
Citations per year, relative to C. C. Booth
C. C. Booth · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by C. C. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. C. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. C. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. C. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. C. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. C. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. C. Booth. The network helps show where C. C. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. C. Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. C. Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. C. Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. C. Booth. C. C. Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 43
2
Efficacy of Rituximab in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome
1
3
Business Ethics and CSR As Part Of MBA Curricula: An Analysis of Student Preference
13
4
Churchill's Doctor. A Biography of Lord Moran
2
5 7
6 3
7 3
8 11
9 18
10 54
11 24
12 78
13 51
14 152
15 32
16 42
17 7
18 1
19 44
20 14

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026