Anthea Tinker

4.3k citations
163 papers · 3.0k indexed · h-index 30

Anthea Tinker

151 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Anthea Tinker
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 217
  • Demography 1.4k
  • Health 717
  • Occupational Therapy 186
  • General Health Professions 844
Replace Judith Sixsmith with:
Judith Sixsmith United Kingdom
Hal Kendig Australia
Emily M. Agree United States
Frank Oswald Germany
Neena L. Chappell Canada
Janine Wiles New Zealand
Zachary Zimmer United States
Douglas A. Wolf United States
Andrew Wister Canada
Mélanie Levasseur Canada
Anthea Tinker relative to Judith Sixsmith United Kingdom Judith Sixsmith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Judith Sixsmith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthea Tinker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthea Tinker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthea Tinker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthea Tinker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthea Tinker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthea Tinker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthea Tinker. The network helps show where Anthea Tinker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anthea Tinker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthea Tinker Line = papers co-authored together Anthea Tinker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20244
4 20242
5 202025
6 20196
7 201865
8 201678
9 201661
10 20166
11 201527
12 201138
13 2009137
14 200556
15
University research ethics committees: their role, remit and conduct.
200445
16 200317
17
Measuring the impact of a clinical nursing information system on one nursing unit.
19938
18 19912
19
Staying at home, helping elderly people
198420
20 19761

About Anthea Tinker

Anthea Tinker is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Demography, Health, Occupational Therapy and General Health Professions, having authored 163 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (50 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (31 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (25 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (22 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (19 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (17 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (16 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (217 citations), Demography (1.4k citations), Health (717 citations), Occupational Therapy (186 citations) and General Health Professions (844 citations). Anthea Tinker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ukraine and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Claudine McCreadie, Giorgio Di Gessa, Jill Manthorpe, Karen Glaser, Debora Price, Karen Glaser, Bob Erens, Peter Lansley, Simon Biggs and Sophie Sarre. Their work appears in journals such as Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, Ageing and Society, The Journal of Adult Protection, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026