John J. Kao

14 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

John J. Kao
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Strategy and Management 204
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 144
  • Sociology and Political Science 116
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 113
  • Accounting 84
Replace Adèle Thomas with:
Adèle Thomas South Africa
Shobha Das India
María Iborra Spain
H. Alvin Ng New Zealand
Joseph L. Balloun United States
Sheri Perelli United States
Peter A.C. Smith United States
Aki Koponen Finland
Anna Krzeminska Australia
Matthew Mitchell United States
John J. Kao relative to Adèle Thomas South Africa Adèle Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Adèle Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Kao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Kao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Kao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Kao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Kao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Kao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Kao. The network helps show where John J. Kao may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Kao

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Kao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Kao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Kao. John J. Kao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 22
2
Innovation Nation: How America Is Losing Its Innovation Edge, Why It Matters, and What We Can Do to Get It Back
46
3
Setting the stage for innovative action.
1
4
Organiser la créativité : l'esprit du jazz
1
5
Innovation : breakthrough ideas at 3M, DuPont, GE, Pfizer, and Rubbermaid
7
6 20
7
Innovation: Breakthrough Thinking at 3M, DuPont, GE, Pfizer, and Rubbermaid
48
8
Jamming: The Art and Discipline of Business Creativity
99
9
The worldwide web of Chinese business
243
10
The Entrepreneurial Organization
49
11
Entrepreneurship, creativity & organization : text, cases & readings
3
12 33
13 68
14 2

About John J. Kao

John J. Kao is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1 paper) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (113 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (144 citations) and Strategy and Management (204 citations). John J. Kao has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ara G. Tilkian, Herbert N. Hultgren, John S. Schroeder, Frederik D. Wiersema, Rosabeth Moss Kanter and Frederick F. Kao. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, The American Journal of Cardiology and Harvard business review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026