John H. Friar

22 papers receiving 953 citations

Peers

John H. Friar
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Strategy and Management 638
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 416
  • Economics and Econometrics 268
  • Management Science and Operations Research 203
  • Management Information Systems 120
Replace Anders Drejer with:
Anders Drejer Denmark
Ludwig Bstieler United States
Valentina Lazzarotti Italy
Fredrik Hacklin Switzerland
Necmi Karagozoglu United States
Ann Ledwith Ireland
Joseph G. Morone United States
W. J. Abernathy United States
S. G. Green United States
Jian Guan China
John H. Friar relative to Anders Drejer Denmark Anders Drejer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Anders Drejer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Friar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Friar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Friar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Friar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Friar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Friar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Friar. The network helps show where John H. Friar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Friar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Friar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Friar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Friar. John H. Friar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
The Current Transformation of Technology Strategy: The Attempt to Create Multiple Avenues for Innovation Within the Large Corporation
0
3 1
4 1
5
Managing Global Outsourcing to Enhance Lean Innovation: Outsourcing Techniques Used by Smaller Firms Can Help Larger Firms Keep R&D Lean While Maintaining Innovation Efficiency
0
6 80
7 21
8 32
9 10
10 23
11 2
12 14
13 94
14 13
15 20
16 20
17 30
18 32
19
The emergence of technology strategy: A new dimension of strategic management
74
20 51

About John H. Friar

John H. Friar is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (16 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers) and Technology Assessment and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (416 citations), Strategy and Management (638 citations) and Business and International Management (71 citations). John H. Friar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include R. Balachandra, Tucker J. Marion, Mel Horwitch, Marc H. Meyer, Kimberly Eddleston, Timothy W. Simpson, Denise Dunlap, David Deeds, William F. Crittenden and Edmund Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Venturing, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Journal of Product Innovation Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026