John C. Campbell
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Naoki IkegamiBenny MorrisGeorge Thomas KurianSusan HortonMichael R. ReichCharles I. BerlínEmily A. TobeyRobert C. Fifer
- Topics
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers)Middle East Politics and Society (2 papers)Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Sensory SystemsSociology and Political SciencePolitical Science and International Relations
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
John C. Campbell
24 papers receiving 746 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Sociology and Political Science 454
- General Health Professions 216
- Political Science and International Relations 203
- Economics and Econometrics 196
- Cognitive Neuroscience 98
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Campbell
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Campbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Campbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Campbell. The network helps show where John C. Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Campbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Campbell. John C. Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 82 | |
| 4 | 77 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | Initiating Public Long-Term-Care Insurance in Japan | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 93 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About John C. Campbell
John C. Campbell is a scholar working on Classics, Political Science and International Relations and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (2 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (61 citations), Sociology and Political Science (454 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (203 citations). John C. Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Naoki Ikegami, Benny Morris, George Thomas Kurian, Susan Horton, Michael R. Reich, Charles I. Berlín, Emily A. Tobey, Robert C. Fifer, James F. Jerger and Soonman Kwon. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Health Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.