Emily A. Tobey
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 0.5%
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.2%
- Signal Processing top 1%
- Co-authors
- Ann E. GeersChristine BrennerAlexandra L. QuittnerLaurie S. EisenbergJohn K. NiparkoJean S. MoogNae‐Yuh WangNancy E. Fink
- Topics
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (80 papers)Hearing Impairment and Communication (27 papers)Noise Effects and Management (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaFrance
In The Last Decade
Emily A. Tobey
96 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.4k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.0k
- Sensory Systems 1.1k
- Speech and Hearing 888
- Signal Processing 573
Countries citing papers authored by Emily A. Tobey
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily A. Tobey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily A. Tobey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily A. Tobey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily A. Tobey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily A. Tobey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily A. Tobey. The network helps show where Emily A. Tobey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily A. Tobey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily A. Tobey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily A. Tobey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily A. Tobey. Emily A. Tobey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 106 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 79 | |
| 7 | 211 | |
| 8 | PRELIMINARY LANGUAGE, SPEECH RECOGNITION & PSYCHOSOCIAL RESULTS IN THE CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT AFTER COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION (CD_ACI) STUDY | 0 |
| 9 | 100 | |
| 10 | 110 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 230 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | Speech self-monitoring by children using an electrotactile speech processor. | 0 |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | Speech Production Results: Speech Feature Acquisition. | 66 |
| 19 | Effects of Cochlear Implants and Tactile Aids on the Development of Speech Production Skills in Children with Profound Hearing Impairment. | 27 |
| 20 | 21 |
About Emily A. Tobey
Emily A. Tobey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing, having authored 101 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (80 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (27 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.4k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.0k citations). Emily A. Tobey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Ann E. Geers, Christine Brenner, Alexandra L. Quittner, Laurie S. Eisenberg, John K. Niparko, Jean S. Moog, Nae‐Yuh Wang, Nancy E. Fink, Peter S. Roland and Andrea D. Warner‐Czyz. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Journal of neurosurgery and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.