John Chesterman

1.9k total citations
61 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

John Chesterman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Chesterman has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Health and 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Chesterman's work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (8 papers). John Chesterman is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare innovation and challenges (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (8 papers). John Chesterman collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Qatar. John Chesterman's co-authors include Linda Bauld, Ken Judge, Janet Ferguson, Brian Galligan, David Challis, Bain Attwood, Jane Hughes, Pamela Brown, Bleddyn Davies and Tim Coleman and has published in prestigious journals such as Addiction, The American Historical Review and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

John Chesterman

51 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Chesterman Australia	15	488	394	305	252	223	61	1.2k
Mike Vuolo United States	20	268 0.5×	384 1.0×	756 2.5×	135 0.5×	195 0.9×	86	1.6k
John R. Finnegan United States	15	92 0.2×	352 0.9×	265 0.9×	138 0.5×	147 0.7×	25	901
Jill Hanley Canada	19	147 0.3×	342 0.9×	466 1.5×	101 0.4×	48 0.2×	65	1.1k
Rebecca Haines‐Saah Canada	20	222 0.5×	419 1.1×	288 0.9×	90 0.4×	168 0.8×	74	1.2k
Eusebio M. Alvaro United States	26	139 0.3×	209 0.5×	547 1.8×	79 0.3×	507 2.3×	54	1.7k
Barbara Plested United States	19	90 0.2×	823 2.1×	193 0.6×	193 0.8×	133 0.6×	23	1.3k
Elisia L. Cohen United States	18	117 0.2×	210 0.5×	356 1.2×	160 0.6×	69 0.3×	51	1.0k
Robert S. Peirce United States	16	47 0.1×	555 1.4×	389 1.3×	263 1.0×	84 0.4×	18	1.4k
Rachel Margolis Canada	24	87 0.2×	518 1.3×	923 3.0×	670 2.7×	230 1.0×	64	2.0k
Helen Moewaka Barnes New Zealand	20	34 0.1×	335 0.9×	504 1.7×	209 0.8×	92 0.4×	64	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by John Chesterman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Chesterman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Chesterman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Chesterman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Chesterman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Chesterman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Chesterman. The network helps show where John Chesterman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Chesterman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Chesterman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Chesterman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Chesterman. John Chesterman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chesterman, John, et al.. (2022). Integrity in Guardianship Decision Making: Applying the Will and Preferences Paradigm. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 23(7). 1129–1136.

Chesterman, John. (2019). The future of adult safeguarding in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 54(4). 360–370. 9 indexed citations

Challis, David, et al.. (2018). Care Management in Social and Primary Health Care. Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham). 1 indexed citations

Chesterman, John. (2014). Modernising Adult Protection in an Age of Choice. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 73(4). 517–524. 2 indexed citations

Williams, Michael A., et al.. (2014). Consent versus scrutiny: restricting liberties in post-Bournewood Victoria.. PubMed. 21(3). 641–60. 7 indexed citations

Williams, Michael, et al.. (2014). Re Jamie (no 2): A positive development for transgender young people.. PubMed. 22(1). 90–104. 2 indexed citations

Williams, Michael, et al.. (2012). Challenging Australia's "closed" model of neonatal care: the need for reform following Re baby D (No 2).. PubMed. 19(4). 835–53. 2 indexed citations

Bauld, Linda, et al.. (2008). Comparing models of smoking treatment in Glasgow: interim report. 2 indexed citations

Chesterman, John, Ken Judge, Linda Bauld, & Janet Ferguson. (2005). How effective are the English smoking treatment services in reaching disadvantaged smokers?. Addiction. 100(s2). 36–45. 48 indexed citations

10.

Judge, Ken, Linda Bauld, John Chesterman, & Janet Ferguson. (2005). The English smoking treatment services: short‐term outcomes. Addiction. 100(s2). 46–58. 111 indexed citations

11.

Ferguson, Janet, Linda Bauld, John Chesterman, & Ken Judge. (2005). The English smoking treatment services: one‐year outcomes. Addiction. 100(s2). 59–69. 285 indexed citations

12.

Bauld, Linda, et al.. (2003). Impact of UK National Health Service smoking cessation services: variations in outcomes in England. Tobacco Control. 12(3). 296–301. 45 indexed citations

13.

Challis, David, et al.. (2002). Care management, dementia care and specialist mental health services: an evaluation. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 17(4). 315–325. 88 indexed citations

14.

Chesterman, John, Linda Bauld, & Ken Judge. (2001). Satisfaction with the care-managed support of older people: an empirical analysis. Health & Social Care in the Community. 9(1). 31–42. 26 indexed citations

15.

Chesterman, John. (2001). The State of Citizenship. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 60(2). 115–118. 1 indexed citations

16.

Bauld, Linda, John Chesterman, & Ken Judge. (2000). Measuring satisfaction with social care amongst older service users: issues from the literature. Health & Social Care in the Community. 8(5). 316–324. 43 indexed citations

17.

Chesterman, John & Brian Galligan. (1999). Defining Australian citizenship : selected documents. 19 indexed citations

18.

Sanders, Will, John Chesterman, & Brian Galligan. (1999). Citizens without Rights: Aborigines and Australian Citizenship. Pacific Affairs. 72(2). 303–303. 2 indexed citations

19.

Davies, Bleddyn, et al.. (1996). The effects of care management on efficiency in long-term care: a new evaluation model applied to British and American data. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 1 indexed citations

20.

Davies, Bleddyn, et al.. (1993). How does care management improve efficiency? The effects of case management inputs on the productivities of home care services. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact