Johan Gottfries
Impact in
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.5%
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 0.5%
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Papers in
-
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses 17
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 19
- Co-authors
- Tudor I. OpreaJohan TryggErik JohanssonLina SjöströmAnders BacklundJohn P. ShockcorUlf EdlundSusanne Wiklund
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (8 papers)Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems (6 papers)Journal of Chemometrics (5 papers)Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (4 papers)Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Johan Gottfries
85 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
- Analytical Chemistry 616
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 857
- Spectroscopy 638
- Molecular Biology 2.5k
- Biophysics 187
Countries citing papers authored by Johan Gottfries
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Gottfries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Gottfries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Gottfries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Gottfries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Gottfries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Gottfries. The network helps show where Johan Gottfries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Gottfries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 61 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 108 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 57 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 85 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 72 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 8 |
About Johan Gottfries
Johan Gottfries is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy, Equine and Molecular Biology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (19 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (17 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (8 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers) and Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (616 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (857 citations), Spectroscopy (638 citations), Molecular Biology (2.5k citations) and Biophysics (187 citations). Johan Gottfries has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tudor I. Oprea, Johan Trygg, Erik Johansson, Lina Sjöström, Anders Backlund, John P. Shockcor, Ulf Edlund, Susanne Wiklund, Ewa J. Mellerowicz and Thomas Möritz. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Journal of Chemometrics, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders and Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.